Author

Mehran Jalaie

5 papers · 2003–2026

2003peak 1 in 20032026

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–5 of 5 RSS

Lessons in Molecular Recognition: The Effects of Ligand and Protein Flexibility on Molecular Docking Accuracy

Jon A. Erickson, Mehran Jalaie, D. H. Robertson +2 more

Computational Theory and Mathematics · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2 Dec 2003 · cited 388× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The key to success for computational tools used in structure-based drug design is the ability to accurately place or "dock" a ligand in the binding pocket of the target of interest. In this report we examine the effect of several factors on docking accuracy, including ligand and protein flexibility. To examine ligand flexibility in an unbiased fashion, a test set of 41 ligand-protein cocomplex X-ray structures were assembled that represent a diversity of size, flexibility, and polarity with respect to the ligands. Four docking algorithms, DOCK, FlexX, GOLD, and CDOCKER, were applied to the test set, and the results were examined in terms of the ability to reproduce X-ray ligand positions within 2.0A heavy atom root-mean-square deviation. Overall, each method performed well (>50% accuracy) but for all methods it was found that docking accuracy decreased substantially for ligands with…

Conditional Probability: A New Fusion Method for Merging Disparate Virtual Screening Results

John W. Raymond, Mehran Jalaie, Mary P. Bradley

Computational Theory and Mathematics · Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences · 21 Jan 2004 · cited 20× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

This paper introduces a new consensus scoring approach for merging the results of different virtual screening methods based on conditional probabilities. The technique is experimentally evaluated using several ligand-based virtual screening methods and compared to two variations of the established Sum-rank fusion method where it performs as well or better than the Sum-rank methods. Our experiments confirm that consensus scoring increases the number of active compounds retrieved with respect to the best individual methods on average.

The flexible alignment of molecular structures using simulated annealing with weighted Lagrangian multipliers

John W. Raymond, Daniel D. Holsworth, Mehran Jalaie

Computational Theory and Mathematics · Journal of Computational Chemistry · 26 Jul 2010 · cited 3× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

A framework for superimposing small molecules is presented. The proposed method consists of a simple atom-based, flexible alignment. The optimization procedure used in the alignment is based on a recently published variant of the simulated annealing whereby nonlinear constraints are accommodated using Lagrangian multipliers. It differs from other published superposition algorithms in that any number of nonlinear constraints can be readily imposed on the structural alignment directly through the objective function without assuming an a priori trade-off between competing conditions. These can include equality and equality constraints on distances, angles, and energy states. Examples illustrating the use of the proposed approach are also provided.

Strategies for Identifying Molecules of Interest in Large Chemical Spaces

Raphael Klein, Sascha Jung, Alexander Neumann +3 more

Computational Theory and Mathematics · Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 10 Jul 2026 · cited 1× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

In recent years make-on-demand compound libraries (so-called Chemical Spaces) have gained more and more interest in pharmaceutical industry. Compound vendors promise cheap compounds, fast delivery, high synthetical accessibility and a large pool of novel chemical matter, fulfilling the requirements of fast Design-Make-Test cycles. Searching in ultralarge Chemical Spaces with known 2D similarity metrics, like fingerprint-based Tanimoto, substructure, or pharmacophore similarity searches, contains pitfalls due to the representation of molecules as synthons with connectivity rules. Applied to a set of almost 3000 drug-relevant queries we analyzed the ability of similarity search methods to retrieve analog compounds from Chemical Spaces, and how to best approach typical use cases in early phase drug discovery. Distinct characteristics of each similarity metric suggest orthogonal…

Lessons in Molecular Recognition: The Effects of Ligand and Protein\nFlexibility on Molecular Docking Accuracy

Jon A. Erickson (2402056), Mehran Jalaie (2039917), Daniel H. Robertson (2727793) +2 more

Computational Theory and Mathematics · Figshare · 7 May 2016 · cited 0× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The key to success for computational tools used in structure-based drug design is the ability\nto accurately place or “dock” a ligand in the binding pocket of the target of interest. In this\nreport we examine the effect of several factors on docking accuracy, including ligand and protein\nflexibility. To examine ligand flexibility in an unbiased fashion, a test set of 41 ligand−protein\ncocomplex X-ray structures were assembled that represent a diversity of size, flexibility, and\npolarity with respect to the ligands. Four docking algorithms, DOCK, FlexX, GOLD, and\nCDOCKER, were applied to the test set, and the results were examined in terms of the ability\nto reproduce X-ray ligand positions within 2.0Å heavy atom root-mean-square deviation. Overall,\neach method performed well (>50% accuracy) but for all methods it was found that docking\naccuracy decreased substantially for…