Lessons in Molecular Recognition:  The Effects of Ligand and Protein\nFlexibility on Molecular Docking Accuracy

Abstract

The key to success for computational tools used in structure-based drug design is the ability\nto accurately place or “dock” a ligand in the binding pocket of the target of interest. In this\nreport we examine the effect of several factors on docking accuracy, including ligand and protein\nflexibility. To examine ligand flexibility in an unbiased fashion, a test set of 41 ligand−protein\ncocomplex X-ray structures were assembled that represent a diversity of size, flexibility, and\npolarity with respect to the ligands. Four docking algorithms, DOCK, FlexX, GOLD, and\nCDOCKER, were applied to the test set, and the results were examined in terms of the ability\nto reproduce X-ray ligand positions within 2.0Å heavy atom root-mean-square deviation. Overall,\neach method performed well (>50% accuracy) but for all methods it was found that docking\naccuracy decreased substantially for ligands with eight or more rotatable bonds. Only\nCDOCKER was able to accurately dock most of those ligands with eight or more rotatable\nbonds (71% accuracy rate). A second test set of structures was gathered to examine how protein\nflexibility influences docking accuracy. CDOCKER was applied to X-ray structures of trypsin,\nthrombin, and HIV-1-protease, using protein structures bound to several ligands and also the\nunbound (apo) form. Docking experiments of each ligand to one “average” structure and to the\napo form were carried out, and the results were compared to docking each ligand back to its\noriginating structure. The results show that docking accuracy falls off dramatically if one uses\nan average or apo structure. In fact, it is shown that the drop in docking accuracy mirrors the\ndegree to which the protein moves upon ligand binding.