Author

Tim Lindsey

27 papers · 1970–2026

1970peak 4 in 20202026

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–25 of 27 RSS

The Criminal Procedure Code

Simon Butt, Tim Lindsey

Law · 22 Oct 2020 · cited 82× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP) is Indonesia’s Code of Criminal Procedure. It governs the roles of the police and prosecutors, the law on arrests, warrants, detention, searches, legal aid, evidence, trials and appeals in most types of cases. When undertaking their investigations, preliminary investigators can generally receive reports and complaints about crimes, search for information and evidence, and stop people they deem suspicious to inspect their identification. KUHAP allows police and other appointed state officials to arrest a person who is ‘strongly suspected’ of a crime, based on ‘sufficient preliminary evidence’. KUHAP permits primary investigators to search a suspect’s body or house for the purposes of the investigation. For house searches, investigators must first obtain a search warrant from the local district court chief judge. KUHAP sets the broad…

Judicial mafia: The courts and state illegality in Indonesia

Simon Butt, Tim Lindsey

Law · 2010 · cited 63× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Judicial mafiaThe courts and state illegality in IndonesiaFor decades, Indonesians have regarded the Indonesian judiciary as one of their nation's most corrupt institutions. 1Surveys indicate that its reputation, ironically, has been for its propensity to act illegally, rather than its capacity to enforce the law, let alone deliver 'justice' (Asia Foundation and ACNielsen Indonesia 2001).Popular belief has it that most of Indonesia's judges and court officials are willing to accept, or even to extort, bribes from litigants to secure victory in their cases, with the Supreme Court seen as one of the most corrupt courts in the country.The Indonesian joke -which even judges tell -has the word hakim (judge) as short for hubungi aku kalau ingin menang (contact me if you want to win). 2 It is also often said in Indonesia that corruption within the judiciary is systematic and institutionalized…

Monopolising Islam: The Indonesian Ulama Council and state regulation of the ‘Islamic economy’

Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies · 27 Jul 2012 · cited 55× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The Ulama Council of Indonesia (MUI) is an advisory body with a nationwide network of branches that produces fatwa ‘to guide the Islamic community and the government’. Nominally an independent NGO, MUI has always had a complex and mutually dependent relationship with the state, which established it and funds it. This paper describes regulatory changes since Soeharto's fall in 1998 that have expanded MUI's formal role in the state system for the administration of Islamic legal traditions and, in particular, the ‘ syariah economy’. These changes have heightened MUI's influence and the legal authority of its fatwa , granting it new institutional roles (and, in some cases, monopolies) in relation to halal certification, Islamic finance and the haj pilgrimage. MUI has now begun to accrue quasi-legislative powers resembling those enjoyed by state ulama councils and state Muftis elsewhere in…

Courting Reform: Indonesia's Islamic Courts and Justice for the Poor

Cate Sumner, Tim Lindsey

Law · International Journal for Court Administration · 15 Dec 2011 · cited 50× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

This paper documents a judicial reform case study in the world’s most populous Islamic country that has involved increasing access to the courts for disadvantaged groups. The process began with an Access and Equity Study in the area of family law conducted by the Religious Courts of Indonesia in partnership with the Family Court of Australia as well as Indonesian research institutes and an NGO for female heads of household. The key findings of that study showed that the 50% of Indonesia’s citizens living below $2 a day would face challenges in bringing their family law cases to the Religious Courts, something that is mandatory under Indonesian law. The paper documents the steps taken by the Religious Courts over the last five years to increase access to the courts for disadvantaged groups, principally women, the poor and those living in remote areas. It is estimated that 30-40,000…

7 When Words FailSyariah Law in Indonesia: Revival, Reform or Transplantation?

Tim Lindsey

Law · 2008 · cited 47× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Most comparatist scholarship on legal transplantation has been conducted in a European setting and does not itself always transplant usefully into other geographic contexts. The notion of 'legal transplantation' is particularly complex in south-east Asia, because almost all formal institutions of the legal systems of most south-east Asian countries are, to a large extent, 'transplants'. Indonesia is not an Islamic state and its Constitution (Undang-Undang Dasar 1945) does not refer to religion except in vague terms and in formulae asserting freedom of religious expression. The application of syariah was determined not by reference to the scriptures of Islam, but by an inquiry into the ethnicity and folk beliefs of the person involved. Success at the local level in Indonesia encouraged proponents of legal Islamisation to revive efforts at the national level. Keywords: Indonesia; Islamic…

ECONOMIC REFORM WHEN THE CONSTITUTION MATTERS: INDONESIA'S CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND ARTICLE 33

Simon Butt, Tim Lindsey

Law · Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies · 9 Jul 2008 · cited 46× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Article 33 of Indonesia's Constitution requires the state to 'control' important branches of production and natural resources. The meaning of 'control' has been a matter of significant debate since Indonesia's independence: does it require the state to manage directly, or is regulation enough? The government has recently sought to break down government monopolies and attract private investment in key sectors. To this end it has enacted a raft of new statutes, but they have been challenged in Indonesia's new Constitutional Court. The Court has opted for the 'direct manage ment' interpretation of article 33, striking down statutes that implicitly interpret it as requiring government regulation only. This paper discusses these decisions and, more broadly, problems arising from judicial intervention in economic policy formation. It also considers how the government has sought to circumvent…

Indonesian Constitutional Reform: Muddling Towards Democracy

Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · 5 Jul 2017 · cited 33× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The First Amendment was passed on 19 October 1999 following the first true democratic election in Indonesia, held in June that year. The Indonesian executive was thus at once both head of state and of government. The balance of the Second Amendment was concerned with issues not addressed by the First Amendment. The fall of Soeharto was, however, accompanied by revelations as to the full extent of the military complicity in state terrorism and private gangsterism, including terrorist bombings, inciting ethnic violence and the murder and torture of civilians. The decentralisation Laws were also criticised by the regions they empowered on the grounds of insecurity: they were seen as gifts from the centre that could be revoked at any time. A further major reform with the potential to reduce the power of both the presidency and the legislature was the establishment of a regional 'senate'.

Reconstituting the Ethnic Chinese in Post-Soeharto Indonesia: Law, Racial Discrimination, and Reform

Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · March 2005 · cited 14× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

INTRODUCTION The fall of Soeharto in 1998 was accompanied by calls for radical reform of the oppressive New Order through which he had ruled and, in particular, its legal system. It was also accompanied by attacks on the ethnic Chinese and their property (Coppel 2002, pp. 15–18; Purdey, this volume). These reflected in mob violence a policy of discrimination against this ethnic group that had been institutionalized over the three decades of the New Order. Since 1998, Indonesia has experienced wide-ranging reform initiatives that have transformed policy, created new state institutions, and introduced a plethora of new regulations. Although the process has been slow, messy, and uneven — and is the subject of harsh criticism, both within Indonesia and internationally — some progress is nonetheless being made (Lindsey 2003). As far as the ethnic Chinese are concerned, however, the extent of…

Retreat from democracy?: The rise of Islam and the challenge for Indonesia

Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · July 2018 · cited 9× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

For much of the past twenty years, Indonesia has been held up as a model of democratic transition for other countries, particularly those with significant Muslim populations. Indonesia's leaders like to present their nation as embodying an exemplary path away from authoritarianism. Their form of government, they say, is tolerant yet enshrines religious practice, offering a political alternative for Muslim communities that is more palatable to the West than the failed Arab Spring and the extremist catastrophes that have engulfed the Middle East since America intervened in Afghanistan and Iraq.

From Soepomo to Prabowo: law, violence and corruption in the Preman state

Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · 7 Apr 2006 · cited 8× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Since Suharto’s fall in May 1998, the Indonesian state has been under constant political pressure domestically and internationally to produce a convincing legal response to violence. The rapes, killings and rioting of 1998 have been a particular concern of reformers, but there has been a more or less constant stream of violent events since the New Order began to unravel in 1997. Most of these events have involved a mixture of private and state-sanctioned violence, often one occurring in conjunction with the other.

The Criminal Code

Simon Butt, Tim Lindsey

Law · 22 Oct 2020 · cited 7× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Indonesia’s Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) or Criminal Code contains the definitions of various criminal acts and the penalties applicable to those who perform them. It is the main source of ‘substantive’ criminal law. KUHP has been amended several times, but never comprehensively. Reform to Indonesian criminal law has instead been primarily achieved through the passage of ‘special’ criminal law statutes that deal with specific crimes. Indonesian criminal law applies to ‘every person who commits a crime in Indonesia’. In other words, it applies in the entire territory of Indonesia, to citizens and non-citizens alike. This territory includes Indonesian airspace, territorial waters, and Indonesia-flagged ships and airplanes. KUHP contains provisions on inchoate offences, such as intent, attempt, and facilitation. As a country with a very traditional civil law legal system…

Public Faces of Sharī’ah in Contemporary Indonesia: Towards a National Madhhab

M. B. Hooker, Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · STUDIA ISLAMIKA · 1970 · cited 6× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The thesis of this article that all faces and expressions of shari'ah in Indonesia must be read together and that together they point to a debate about Islamic law that, while fragmented, might be said to be peculiar to Indonesia. Can they be made to amount to assonance or is dissonance the characteristic of this Madhhab Nasional Shari'ah Republik Indonesia? And if dissonance is the defining characteristic, is that necessarily a bad thing? We will suggest some answers to these questions in the conclusion to this article.DOI: 10.15408/sdi.v10i1.637

Filling the Hole in Indonesia’s Constitutional System: Constitutional Courts and the Review of Regulations in a Split Jurisdiction

Tim Lindsey

Political Science and International Relations · Constitutional Review · 31 May 2018 · cited 5× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The Indonesian constitutional system contains a serious flaw that means that the constitutionality of a large number of laws cannot be determined by any court. Although the jurisdiction for the judicial review of laws is split between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, neither can review the constitutionality of subordinate regulations. This is problematic because in Indonesia the real substance of statutes is often found in implementing regulations, of which there are very many. This paper argues that that is open to the Constitutional Court to reconsider its position on review of regulations in order to remedy this problem. It could do so by interpreting its power of judicial review of statutes to extend to laws below the level of statutes. The paper begins with a brief account of how Indonesia came to have a system of judicial constitutional review that is restricted to…

Crime and punishment in Indonesia

Tim Lindsey, Helen Pausacker

Law · 22 Oct 2020 · cited 4× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The drafting and enforcement of criminal law is the result of a complex interaction between the state, society and individuals. Criminal law is a way of articulating and applying normative ideas about what a community should be like. One of the consequences of the persistent corruption of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia is continuing low levels of competence among many police, prosecutors and judges. The dysfunction of Indonesia’s criminal justice is no recent aberration. In fact, it is the result of long trajectory that Lev traces to the collapse of parliamentary democracy in that late 1950s, but which has antecedents in the ideological debates of nationalist leaders in the years leading to the declaration of independence in 1945. Today, more than two decades since Soeharto resigned, Indonesia’s criminal justice system seems strained close to breaking point. Few who are involved…

Introduction

Tim Lindsey, Helen Pausacker

Sociology and Political Science · 20 May 2016 · cited 3× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

This introduction presents an overview of the key concepts discussed in the subsequent chapters of this book. The book seeks to contribute to the rethinking of the nature of Indonesian Islam that these comments suggest and, in particular, the approach of Indonesia's post-Soeharto religious and political leaders towards religious minorities, both Muslim and non-Muslim. It deals more specifically with 'Freedom of Religion under the Constitution'. In it, Simon Butt examines the nature of freedom of religion in the Constitution and tracks cases examined by the Constitutional Court, including the Religious Courts case, the Polygamy case and the Blasphemy Law case. Melissa Crouch investigates the role of the state in promoting and maintaining equality between religious communities and Greg Fealy introduces Part II with an essay that sets a framework for political analysis of religious…

Islamization, law, and the Indonesian courts

Tim Lindsey

Law · 3 Jan 2018 · cited 2× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Indonesia’s governments have been adept at using the bureaucratic and legal mechanisms of state to assert control over the interpretation of Islam, the religion of at least 80% of the population. They have done this by close management of the administration of Islamic legal traditions, interpreting them to suit their wider political aims, creating what amounts to a kind of state madhhab, or school of law. This chapter offers two case studies to show how the state, though the courts, has responded to the challenges presented by conservative Islam in the two decades since Suharto resigned in 1998: judicial interpretation of the law on freedom of religion and decision making in Indonesia’s Islamic courts. It argues that strategies for and against Islamization in Indonesia are most often expressed in terms of state regulation of Islamic legal traditions, that is, firmly within the framework…

Child Maintenance after Divorce: Review on the practices in Malaysian Shariah Courts

Nurhidayah Muhammad Hashim, Tim Lindsey, Zuliza Mohd Kusrin +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal · 22 Jun 2024 · cited 1× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

This paper reviews the practices of the Shariah courts in Malaysia in determining child maintenance applications. It adopts the qualitative legal research methodology, where data was collected from international treaties, legislation, and child maintenance cases decided by the courts and analyzed descriptively and thematically. The study reveals the existence of non-standardization practices related to the assessment of the needs of the child and the father's ability due to the general provisions and the absence of guidelines for judges. This study highlights the need for establishing guidelines to ensure children can enjoy a better quality of life even after divorce.

Between Tradition and Change, Moderation and Extremism

Tim Lindsey, Helen Pausacker, Jamhari Makruf

Sociology and Political Science · 11 Jan 2023 · cited 1× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The rapid democratisation that followed the fall of Soeharto's repressive ‘New Order’ in 1998 allowed a public expression of Islamic identity in ways unimaginable just a few years earlier. The so-called ‘Islamic revival’ that ensued led to rising religious intolerance and popular calls for greater recognition of shari'a (Islamic law). However, although Indonesia certainly has some radical Islamist schools, most Islamic educational institutions, like those who teach and work in them, are not supporters of extreme Islamist ideas or even conservative religious intolerance. In fact, many make significant efforts to counter these ideas and promote religious pluralism. However, religious extremism and intolerance are not the only challenges faced by Islamic educators in Indonesia today, from pesantrens and madrasahs to universities. Inadequate government support for the sector is a…

Unfinished Business

Tim Lindsey, Simon Butt

Law · Columbia University Press eBooks · 27 Aug 2013 · cited 1× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract This concluding chapter assesses how far Indonesia's legal system has come from the “institutional shambles” of 1998 to the rule of law, focusing on the role of the Mahkamah Agung (Supreme Court). Regulating the substance of regional laws—i.e. “cleaning up the legal debris”—is the mandate of the Supreme Court. However, the massive process of decentralization since 2001 has created numerous parallel institutions and overlaps of mandates that the central state and legal system have yet to master and regulate. In the perda (regional regulations) review cases in particular, the Supreme Court has failed to adequately referee disputes over the competing jurisdictions of various tiers of government arising out of decentralization and has failed to clarify what the “law” is, thus creating confusion and uncertainty. If this trend continues, the Supreme Court could undermine its primary…

Who Owns the Economy? Property Rights, Privatization, and the Indonesian Constitution: The <i>Electricity Law</i> Case

Simon Butt, Tim Lindsey

Political Science and International Relations · 25 Feb 2010 · cited 1× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract Indonesia's 1945 Constitution reflects a broad mix of Leftist, nationalist and anti-colonial ideals that were influential at the time it was first drafted. Article 33 granted the state control over natural resources and essential industries, with the expectation that the Indonesian people — particularly the poor — would benefit from them. Art 33 provides for significant government intervention in the economy and has, from 1997, been a rallying point for opposition to market-oriented policies ‘pushed’ by multilateral lenders and donors. This chapter focuses upon the Constitutional Court's interpretation of Art 33 and its implications for property ownership and privatization in Indonesia. It begins by setting out Art 33 and aspects of the debates in 2001 in the MPR (Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat or People's Deliberative Assembly, entrusted with amending the Constitution) which…

Faith versus Fact: Law, Politics, and Expert Witnesses in Indonesian Blasphemy Cases

Rafiqa Qurrata A'yun, Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Law and Religion · 29 Sep 2026 · cited 0× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract In this article, we investigate the role of religious experts in criminal cases related to blasphemy in Indonesia, a country with one of the world’s largest Muslim populations. Our analysis of 106 decisions in blasphemy-related cases between 2011 and 2022 shows that expert witnesses in these cases have been much more influential than in other criminal cases, with their testimony often leading to conviction. We found that religious experts in cases of blasphemy against Islam were predominantly members of the Indonesian Ulama Council (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, or MUI) which has an institutionalized link to the government that provides it with funding and personal connections to senior government officials. With its great public legitimacy, MUI members are preferred by police and judges over religious experts not affiliated with it. We argue that this preference is not simply an…

Introduction

Simon Butt, Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · 17 Jun 2026 · cited 0× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Indonesia’s legal system stands at a critical juncture. Almost three decades after the fall of Soeharto’s authoritarian New Order regime in 1998, the country faces profound challenges in translating constitutional promises, democratic aspirations and legal reforms into practical realities. This book examines Indonesian law across 14 major areas, revealing patterns of both progress and regression in the world’s third-largest democracy and most populous Muslim-majority nation.

The Legislatures of Indonesia

Simon Butt, Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · 2 Feb 2023 · cited 0× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

In Indonesia, the national legislative power of the state is exercised primarily through the DPR (Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, People's Representative Assembly). However, Indonesia has two additional national-level institutions that have roles in national lawmaking, albeit very limited ones. These are the People's Consultative Assembly (MPR or Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat) and the Regional Representative Assembly (DPD or Dewan Perwakilan Daerah). This chapter discusses the powers and functions of these three legislative bodies and explains their evolution from the authoritarian reign of President Soeharto (1967–1998) to the modern democratic era.

Reconsidering reform

Tim Lindsey

Political Science and International Relations · 22 Oct 2020 · cited 0× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

In 1974, two men, Sengkon and Karta, were accused of the murder in Bojongsari, Bekasi, of a food-stall vendor, Sulaiman, and his wife, Siti Haya, who was also raped. Sengkon and Karta were local farmers and, on some accounts, preman. In Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana, judicial reconsideration is described as an ‘extraordinary legal measure’. Article 263 of Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Acara Pidana states that it can be sought by a convicted person or his or her heir from the Supreme Court in respect of any judgment that has acquired binding legal force, except an acquittal or dismissal. Indonesia’s Constitutional Court is not an appeal court. Its jurisdiction is strictly limited to determining the constitutionality of statutes, adjudicating impeachment proceedings, and resolving disputes between state institutions and about election results. The Constitutional Court made more…

Islamic courts or courts for Muslims? Shari’a and the state in Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore

Tim Lindsey

Sociology and Political Science · 3 Nov 2016 · cited 0× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

After achieving independence in the decades following World War II, the nationalist leaders of Southeast Asian countries with Muslim populations naturally treated their Muslim populations very differently than had their former colonial overlords. In Indonesia and Malaysia, Muslims were a majority and now became the rulers, as well as the ruled. In Singapore, they were still largely excluded from power, but remained a significant minority. Despite this, the new ruling elites in each of these countries rejected calls for an Islamic state; instead, they chose forms of modern nation-state in which Islam was given limited voice in formal governance. Only heavily institutionalised and regulated (and thus restricted) roles in public life were allowed for the selected Islamic legal traditions2 that they were willing to apply to their Muslim citizens. To achieve this, each of these three…