Author

SC Woolley

4 papers · 2016–2017

2016peak 2 in 20162017

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–4 of 4 RSS

Computational propaganda worldwide: Executive summary

Sociology and Political Science · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2017 · cited 164× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

The Computational Propaganda Research Project at the Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, has researched the use of social media for public opinion manipulation. The team involved 12 researchers across nine countries who, altogether, interviewed 65 experts, analyzed tens of millions posts on seven different social media platforms during scores of elections, political crises, and national security incidents. Each case study analyzes qualitative, quantitative, and computational evidence collected between 2015 and 2017 from Brazil, Canada, China, Germany, Poland, Taiwan, Russia, Ukraine, and the United States.

Computational propaganda in the United States of America: Manufacturing consensus online

SC Woolley, Douglas Guilbeault

Sociology and Political Science · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2017 · cited 118× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

Do bots have the capacity to influence the flow of political information over social media? This working paper answers this question through two methodological avenues: A) a qualitative analysis of how political bots were used to support United States presidential candidates and campaigns during the 2016 election, and B) a network analysis of bot influence on Twitter during the same event. Political bots are automated software programs that operate on social media, written to mimic real people in order to manipulate public opinion. The qualitative findings are based upon nine months of fieldwork on the campaign trail, including interviews with bot makers, digital campaign strategists, security consultants, campaign staff, and party officials. During the 2016 campaign, a bipartisan range of domestic and international political actors made use of political bots. The Republican Party…

Political communication, computational propaganda, and autonomous agents - Introduction

PN Howard, SC Woolley

Communication · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · October 2016 · cited 88× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

The Internet certainly disrupted our understanding of what communication can be, who does it, how, and to what effect. What constitutes the Internet has always been an evolving suite of technologies and a dynamic set of social norms, rules, and patterns of use. But the shape and character of digital communications are shifting again—the browser is no longer the primary means by which most people encounter information infrastructure. The bulk of digital communications are no longer between people but between devices, about people, over the Internet of things. Political actors make use of technological proxies in the form of proprietary algorithms and semiautomated social actors—political bots—in subtle attempts to manipulate public opinion. These tools are scaffolding for human control, but the way they work to afford such control over interaction and organization can be unpredictable…

Bots and Automation over Twitter during the Second U.S. Presidential Debate

Philip N. Howard, Bence Kollányi, SC Woolley

Sociology and Political Science · Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) · 2016 · cited 49× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

Bots are social media accounts that automate interaction with other users, and political bots have been particularly active on public policy issues, political crises, and elections. We collected data on bot activity using the major hashtags related to the U.S. Presidential debate. In this brief analysis we find that (1) Twitter traffic on pro-Trump hashtags was roughly double that of the pro-Clinton hashtags, (2) about one third of the pro-Trump twitter traffic was driven by bots and highly automated accounts, compared to one quarter of the pro-Clinton twitter traffic, (3) the significant rise of Twitter traffic around debate time is mostly from real users who generate original tweets using the more neutral hashtags. In short, Twitter is much more actively pro-Trump than pro-Clinton and more of the pro-Trump twitter traffic is driven by bots, but a significant number of (human) users…