Author

Rob Cross

23 papers · 2000–2015

2000peak 7 in 20042015

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–23 of 23 RSS

THE STRENGTH OF WEAK TIES YOU CAN TRUST: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF TRUST IN EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER.

Daniel Z. Levin, Rob Cross, Lisa C. Abrams

Communication · Academy of Management Proceedings · August 2002 · cited 2,726× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Recent research suggests that people obtain complex, useful knowledge from other people with whom they work closely and frequently (i.e., strong ties). Yet there has been only limited systematic empirical work examining why strong ties are important for knowledge transfer. Based on a review of the social network, trust, and knowledge/organizational learning literatures, we propose a model whereby two-party (dyadic) trust mediates the relationship between strong ties and effective knowledge transfer. We tested this model with a two-stage survey in three companies in different countries and found strong support. First, the relationship between strong ties and effective knowledge transfer (as reported by the knowledge receiver) was mediated by competence- and benevolence-based trust. Second, once we controlled for these two dimensions of trust, it was actually weak ties that provided the…

A Relational View of Information Seeking and Learning in Social Networks

Stephen P. Borgatti, Rob Cross

Communication · Management Science · April 2003 · cited 2,090× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Research in organizational learning has demonstrated processes and occasionally performance implications of acquisition of declarative (know-what) and procedural (know-how) knowledge. However, considerably less attention has been paid to learned characteristics of relationships that affect the decision to seek information from other people. Based on a review of the social network, information processing, and organizational learning literatures, along with the results of a previous qualitative study, we propose a formal model of information seeking in which the probability of seeking information from another person is a function of (1) knowing what that person knows; (2) valuing what that person knows; (3) being able to gain timely access to that person's thinking; and (4) perceiving that seeking information from that person would not be too costly. We also hypothesize that the knowing…

Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks

Lisa C. Abrams, Rob Cross, Eric Lesser +1 more

Communication · Academy of Management Perspectives · November 2003 · cited 692× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Executive Overview In many organizations, informal networks are the primary means by which employees find information, solve complex problems, and learn how to do their work. Two forms of interpersonal trust—trust in a person's competence and in a person's benevolence—enable effective knowledge creation and sharing in these networks. Yet, though conceptually appealing, trust is an elusive concept that is often difficult for managers to influence. We conducted interviews in 20 organizations to identify ways in which interpersonal trust in a knowledge-sharing context develops. Based on this work, we summarize behaviors (e.g., discretion, consistency, collaboration) and practices (e.g., building shared vision, ensuring transparency in decision-making, holding people accountable for trust) for managers interested in promoting trust (and thereby knowledge creation and sharing) within their…

The People Who Make Organizations Go—or Stop

Rob Cross, Laurence Prusak

Communication · Oxford University Press eBooks · 14 Aug 2003 · cited 374× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

We’re all familiar with the truism “It’s not what you know, it’s who you know.” Managers invariably use their personal contacts when they need to, say, meet an impossible deadline, get advice on a strategic decision, or learn the truth about a new boss. Increasingly, it’s through these informal networks—not just through traditional organizational hierarchies— that information is found and work gets done. Social networks can be powerful political tools as well; few managers can resist the temptation to use their connections to discredit business initiatives they dislike or to support proposals they favor. Most corporations, however, treat informal networks as an invisible enemy—one that keeps decisions from being made and work from getting done. To many senior executives, these intricate webs of communication are unobservable and ungovernable—and, therefore, not amenable to the tools of…

Trust and Knowledge Sharing: A Critical Combination

Daniel Z. Levin, Rob Cross, Lisa C. Abrams +1 more

Communication · 8 Jan 2004 · cited 158× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract This chapter focuses on the importance of trust in supporting effective knowledge sharing, highlighting the importance of both competence and benevolence in developing trustworthy relationships with others. It discusses a survey of 138 employees from three companies: a division from a US pharmaceutical company, a division of a British bank, and a large group within a Canadian oil and gas company. All three groups were composed of people engaged in knowledge-intensive work. Respondents were asked to consider a recent project they had worked on, and to rate the usefulness of the knowledge they received from those whom they had sought out advice on that project. The results of the survey, which were similar across the three companies, identified some actionable recommendations for companies looking to share knowledge more effectively across their organizations.

Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks

Rob Cross, Andrew Parker, Laurence Prusak +1 more

Communication · 8 Jan 2004 · cited 108× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract This chapter focuses on how four important drivers — awareness, access, engagement, and safety — influence how knowledge travels across informal networks. It describes a research program to determine the means for improving employees' ability to create and share knowledge in important social networks. In the first phase of the research, characteristics of relationships that forty managers relied on for learning and knowledge sharing in important projects were assessed. In the second phase, social network analysis was employed to map these dimensions of relationships among strategically important networks of people in various organizations. Working with a consortium of Fortune 500 companies and government organizations, empirical support for relational characteristics that facilitate knowledge creation and sharing in social networks was developed as well as insight into social…

The Ties That Share: Relational Characteristics That Facilitate Information Seeking

Rob Cross, Stephen P. Borgatti

Communication · The MIT Press eBooks · 18 Jun 2004 · cited 100× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The concept of social capital, or the value that can be derived from social ties created by goodwill, mutual support, shared language, common beliefs, and a sense of mutual obligation, has been applied to a number of fields, from sociology to management. It is only lately, however, that researchers in information technology and knowledge management have begun to explore the idea of social capital in relation to their fields. This collection of thirteen essays by computer scientists, sociologists, communication specialists, economists, and others presents a multidisciplinary look at this particular intersection of information technology and social science and the need to adopt a sociotechnical perspective.For the most part the contributors take a positive view of the interplay of social capital, knowledge sharing, and community building. Some essays look at specific instances, including…

Managing Collaboration: Improving Team Effectiveness through a Network Perspective

Rob Cross, Kate Ehrlich, Ross Dawson +1 more

Communication · California Management Review · July 2008 · cited 69× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Whether selling products or services, making strategic decisions, delivering solutions, or driving innovation, most work of any substance today is accomplished by teams. However, since the early 1990s, teams have evolved from more stable groups-where members were co-located, dedicated to a common mission, and directed by a single leader-to more matrixed entities with colleagues located around the world, juggling time between several projects, and accountable to multiple leaders. As teams have become more fluid, substantial challenges have been posed to traditional advice on team formation, leadership, roles, and process. This article describes how leaders at all levels within an organization can obtain innovation and performance benefits by shifting focus from forming teams to developing networks at key points of execution.

The right friends in the right places: Understanding network structure as a predictor of voluntary turnover.

Gary A. Ballinger, Rob Cross, Brooks C. Holtom

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Applied Psychology · 23 Nov 2015 · cited 53× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Research examining the relationship between social networks and employee retention has focused almost exclusively on the number of direct links and generally found that having more ties decreases the likelihood of turnover. The present research moves beyond simple measures of network centrality to investigate the relationship between 2 additional, and theoretically distinct, facets of social capital and voluntary turnover. In 2 organizations, we found consistent evidence of a negative relationship between reputation, as measured by relationships with highly sought-out others (incoming eigenvector centrality) and voluntary turnover. Further, we found that the negative relationship between brokerage (structural holes) and turnover is significant, but only for higher-level employees. The theoretical and practical implications of expanding the suite of social capital measures to understand…

Performance Benefits From Providing Assistance in Networks: Relationships That Generate Learning

Neha Shah, Rob Cross, Daniel Z. Levin

Communication · Journal of Management · 4 May 2015 · cited 51× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Social network scholarship emphasizes that receiving resources from others in a network can benefit an individual’s job performance. Yet this paradigm rarely considers the effects on the provider of assistance. Outside the networks literature, scholars have been increasingly attentive to factors that affect motivations to provide help (i.e., prosocial motivation). However, the performance effects associated with providing help have been mixed. We concentrate specifically upon assistance that has the potential to enhance the providers’ learning and knowledge base and, hence, their performance. Using a bounded-network survey in a large consulting firm, we show that providing problem-solving assistance to many others on task-related matters increases the provider’s own work performance. We then consider how this learning may be affected by other relational and contextual factors. In so…

Where Has the Time Gone? Addressing Collaboration Overload in a Networked Economy

Rob Cross, Peter Gray

Communication · California Management Review · November 2013 · cited 41× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

As a result of the spread of social media and collaboration technologies in the workplace, the adoption of matrix-based structures, and the proliferation of initiatives to create a “one firm” culture, many organizations are experiencing collaboration overload. Too often, excessive collaboration harms organizational performance, overworking employees for only marginal gains. High-performing employees are especially vulnerable because they already shoulder a disproportionate collaboration burden. This article shows how traditional approaches to improving collaboration often invisibly slow decision making and hurt performance, and describes how companies can identify and address points of collaboration overload and use structural and behavioral interventions to streamline information-sharing and decision-making interactions.

Why Should I Trust You? Predictors of Interpersonal Trust in a Knowledge Transfer Context

Daniel Z. Levin, Rob Cross

Communication · 2002 · cited 37× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

Prior research has demonstrated that interpersonal trust is critical to knowledge transfer in organizational settings. Yet there has been only limited systematic empirical work examining factors that promote a knowledge seekers trust in a knowledge source. We propose three categories of variables that affect interpersonal trust in this context: attributes of the relationship between the knowledge seeker and source; attributes of the knowledge source; and attributes of the knowledge seeker. We analyzed these multilevel data simultaneously with hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) using survey data from three companies in different industries and countries. We found that (1) variables in all three categories were statistically significant, with the biggest effect coming from more malleable features such as the cognitive dimension of social capital (i.e., shared vision and shared language)…

The Social Side of Performance

Rob Cross, Thomas H. Davenport, Susan Cantrell

Communication · MIT Sloan management review · 2003 · cited 31× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Cancer spread to the cystic duct is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with gallbladder carcinoma. This may be due to the high incidence of concomitant perineural invasion and lymph node metastasis associated with cancer spread.

Charged up: Creating energy in organizations

Rob Cross, Andrew Parker

Communication · Journal of Organizational Excellence · 12 Aug 2004 · cited 30× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract The ability of an individual to energize others is a determinant of individual and group success. People who are “energizers” are more effective at motivating others, eliciting productive solutions, getting work done, and advancing their careers. Drawing on their research into social networks, the authors examine five dimensions of energizing relationships and offer some simple questions for determining whether you are an energizer or a de‐energizer. © 2004 by Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation

WHITE PAPER Knowing What We Know: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in Social Networks

Rob Cross, Andrew Parker, Laurence Prusak

Communication · 2000 · cited 7× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract Many early knowledge management initiatives focused heavily on informationtechnology and codified knowledge and so missed performance improvementopportunities from interventions targeting knowledge embedded within networks ofemployees. Despite advanced technical solutions employed to manage organizationalknowledge, we continue to find that people are often more reliant on other people thanthey are on databases when seeking answers to unstructured questions. As a result,organizations creating more cohesive networks on knowledge related dimensions arebetter able to collectively solve problems, create new knowledge and transfer explicit andtacit knowledge embodied within employees. The following article reports on a cross-industry research program assessing ways to promote knowledge creation and transfer innetworks of employees. Specifically, we have found four characteristics of…

PERCEIVED TRUSTWORTHINESS OF KNOWLEDGE SOURCES: THE MODERATING IMPACT OF RELATIONSHIP LENGTH.

Daniel Z. Levin, Ellen M. Whitener, Rob Cross

Sociology and Political Science · Academy of Management Proceedings · August 2004 · cited 6× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Exploring an extension of social identity theory using manager-subordinate relationships, we found that trust is based on different expectations at different stages in relationships: depersonalized social attraction (e.g., demographic similarity) in new relationships; individualized social attraction (e.g., shared perspective) in longer relationships; and trustworthy behaviors, only transitionally, during middle-stage relationships.

RELATIONAL AND STRUCTURAL NETWORK CORRELATES OF INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE IN KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE WORK.

Rob Cross, Jonathon N. Cummings

Sociology and Political Science · Academy of Management Proceedings · August 2003 · cited 2× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

This article argues that individual performance in knowledge intensive work is impacted by both relational and structural network characteristics. Egocentric and bounded network data from 101 engineers within a petrochemical company and 125 consultants within a strategy-consulting firm support the contention that both relational and structural network characteristics matter for individual performance in knowledge intensive work. Implications for a relational view of social capital as well as the integration of information processing and social network literatures are discussed. It is found that characteristics of relationships in networks are correlates of performance in models that control for structure. In this sense, not all relationships are equal--who one is connected to can matter for performance beyond a given relationship's contribution to network structure. Second, it is found…

Rob Cross, Andrew Parker

Communication · 30 Aug 2014 · cited 0× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

A bird’s-eye view: Using social network analysis to improve knowledge creation and sharing A significant yet often overlooked component of people’s information environments is composed of the relationships that they use to acquire information and knowledge. Social network analysis (SNA) allows managers to visualize and understand the myriad of relationships that can either facilitate or impede knowledge creation and transfer. In research conducted by the IBM Institute for Knowledge- Based Organizations, we discovered four different relationship dimensions which are important for effective learning. By analyzing and applying these dimensions to important groups of people within an organization, we can improve knowledge creation

Beyond answers: dimensions of the advice network

Rob Cross A, Stephen P. Borgatti B, Andrew Parker C

Sociology and Political Science · 22 Aug 2013 · cited 0× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

In this paper, we report the result of a research project investigating social aspects of knowledge sharing and development. Prior research in a consulting firm revealed that respondents recognized five kinds of informational benefits when consulting others: solutions, meta-knowledge, problem reformulation, validation and legitimation. We employed these dimensions in a systematic network analysis of a different sample of people (human resource managers in a large conglomerate), using each of the five benefits as kinds of social relations. Two general research questions guided the analysis. First, how are these relations related to each other (multiplexity)? Do individuals obtain all of the benefits from the same individuals, or do they create balanced portfolios of complementary contacts that provide different benefits? Second, what properties and shapes do the networks induced by these…

Sustainability in the Broader Landscape

Rob Cross, Spencer Roger

Sociology and Political Science · SPIE eBooks · 29 Jan 2009 · cited 0× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The CSIRO Publishing BioSelect collection includes four titles from the CSIRO Publishing Garden Guides series. These guides cover gardening practices for low-water environments, sustainable gardening within small spaces, and ornamental gardens for the modern day.

Introduction to Sustainability