arXiv.itsnick.co

an independent field guide to 23 million papers from arXiv & OpenAlex — not affiliated with arXiv.org

Author

Nir Magrafta

4 papers · 2023–2025

2023: 12024: 22025: 1
2023peak 2 in 20242025

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–4 of 4 RSS

Pseudorandom and Pseudoentangled States from Subset States

Fernando Granha Jeronimo, Nir Magrafta, Pei Wu

quant-ph · · cited 2× · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Pseudorandom states (PRS) are an important primitive in quantum cryptography. In this paper, we show that subset states can be used to construct PRSs. A subset state with respect to $S$, a subset of the computational basis, is \[ \frac{1}{\sqrt{|S|}}\sum_{i\in S} |i\rangle. \] As a technical centerpiece, we show that for any fixed subset size $|S|=s$ such that $s = 2^n/ω(\mathrm{poly}(n))$ and $s=ω(\mathrm{poly}(n))$, where $n$ is the number of qubits, a random subset state is information-theoretically indistinguishable from a Haar random state even provided with polynomially many copies. This range of parameter is tight. Our work resolves a conjecture by Ji, Liu and Song. Since subset states of small size have small entanglement across all cuts, this construction also illustrates a pseudoentanglement phenomenon.

Real-Valued Somewhat-Pseudorandom Unitaries

Zvika Brakerski, Nir Magrafta

quant-ph · · cited 1× · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

We explore a very simple distribution of unitaries: random (binary) phase -- Hadamard -- random (binary) phase -- random computational-basis permutation. We show that this distribution is statistically indistinguishable from random Haar unitaries for any polynomial set of orthogonal input states (in any basis) with polynomial multiplicity. This shows that even though real-valued unitaries cannot be completely pseudorandom (Haug, Bharti, Koh, arXiv:2306.11677), we can still obtain some pseudorandom properties without giving up on the simplicity of a real-valued unitary. Our analysis shows that an even simpler construction: applying a random (binary) phase followed by a random computational-basis permutation, would suffice, assuming that the input is orthogonal and \emph{flat} (that is, has high min-entropy when measured in the computational basis). Using quantum-secure one-way functions…

State-Based Classical Shadows

Zvika Brakerski, Nir Magrafta, Tomer Solomon

quant-ph · · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Classical Shadow Tomography (Huang, Kueng and Preskill, Nature Physics 2020) is a method for creating a classical snapshot of an unknown quantum state, which can later be used to predict the value of an a-priori unknown observable on that state. In the short time since their introduction, classical shadows received a lot of attention from the physics, quantum information, and quantum computing (including cryptography) communities. In particular there has been a major effort focused on improving the efficiency, and in particular depth, of generating the classical snapshot. Existing constructions rely on a distribution of unitaries as a central building block, and research is devoted to simplifying this family as much as possible. We diverge from this paradigm and show that suitable distributions over \emph{states} can be used as the building block instead. Concretely, we create the…

Coherence in Property Testing: Quantum-Classical Collapses and Separations

Fernando Granha Jeronimo, Nir Magrafta, Joseph Slote +1 more

quant-ph · · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Understanding the power and limitations of classical and quantum information and how they differ is a fundamental endeavor. In property testing of distributions, a tester is given samples over a typically large domain $\{0,1\}^n$. An important property is the support size both of distributions [Valiant and Valiant, STOC'11], as well, as of quantum states. Classically, even given $2^{n/16}$ samples, no tester can distinguish distributions of support size $2^{n/8}$ from $2^{n/4}$ with probability better than $2^{-Θ(n)}$, even promised they are flat. Quantum states can be in a coherent superposition of states of $\{0,1\}^n$, so one may ask if coherence can enhance property testing. Flat distributions naturally correspond to subset states, $|ϕ_S \rangle=1/\sqrt{|S|}\sum_{i\in S}|i\rangle$. We show that coherence alone is not enough, Coherence limitations: Given $2^{n/16}$ copies, no tester…