Author

Ned Block

13 papers · 1981–2024

1981peak 2 in 20082024

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–13 of 13 RSS

Psychologism and Behaviorism

Ned Block

Computational Theory and Mathematics · The Philosophical Review · 1981 · cited 549× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

... This paper makes two claims: first, psychologism is true, and thus a natural behaviorist analysis of intelligence that is incompatible with psychologism is false. Second, the standard arguments against behaviorism are inadequate to defeat this natural behaviorist analysis of intelligence or to establish psychologism. While psychologism is of course anathema to behaviorists, it also seems wrong-headed to many philosophers who would not classify themselves as behaviorists. For example, Michael Dummett says: If a Martian could learn to speak a human language, or a robot be devised to behave in just the ways that are essential to a language speaker, an implicit knowledge of the correct theory of meaning for the language could be attributed to the Martian or the robot with as much right as to a human speaker, even though their internal mechanisms were entirely different. (Dummett, 1976)…

Biology versus computation in the study of consciousness

Ned Block

Computational Theory and Mathematics · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · March 1997 · cited 56× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The distinction between phenomenal (P) and access (A) consciousness arises from the battle between biological and computational approaches to the mind. If P = A, the computationalists are right; but if not, the biological nature of P yields its scientific nature.

Searle’s Arguments against Cognitive Science

Ned Block

Computational Theory and Mathematics · 22 Aug 2002 · cited 23× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract Searle’s strategy is one of avoiding quibbles about specific programs by imagining that cognitive science of the distant future can come up with the program of an actual person who speaks and understands Chinese, and that this program can be implemented in a machine. Unlike many critics of the computer model, Searle is willing to grant that perhaps this can be done so as to focus on his claim that even if this can be done, the machine will not have intentional states.

The Canberra Plan neglects ground

Ned Block

Political Science and International Relations · Cambridge University Press eBooks · 28 Feb 2015 · cited 12× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

This paper argues that the “Canberra Plan” picture of physicalistic reduction of mind--a picture shared by both its proponents and opponents, philosophers as diverse as David Armstrong, David Chalmers Frank Jackson, Jaegwon Kim, Joe Levine and David Lewis--neglects ground (Fine, 2001, 2012). To the extent that the point of view endorsed by the Canberra Plan has an account of the physical/functional ground of mind at all, it is in one version trivial and in another version implausible. In its most general form, the point of view of the Canberra Plan is committed to unacceptably treating indexical or name-related facts as part of the ultimate physical/functional ground of the mental.

Mind, computational theories of

Ned Block, Georges Rey

Computational Theory and Mathematics · 11 Sep 2018 · cited 1× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The computational theory of mind (CTM) is the theory that the mind can be understood as a computer or, roughly, as the ‘software program’ of the brain. It is the most influential form of ‘functionalism’, according to which what distinguishes a mind is not what it is made of, nor a person’s behavioural dispositions, but the way in which the brain is organized. CTM underlies some of the most important research in current cognitive science, for example, theories of artificial intelligence, perception, decision making and linguistics. CTM involves a number of important ideas. (1) Computations can be defined over syntactically specifiable symbols (that is, symbols specified by rules governing their combination) possessing semantic properties (or ‘meaning’). For example, addition can be captured by rules defined over decimal numerals (symbols) that name the numbers. (2) Computations can be…

Core cognition and perceptual analogs of concepts

Ned Block

Statistics and Probability · 16 Feb 2023 · cited 0× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract This chapter discusses whether borderline cases challenge a joint in nature, focusing on a borderline case that putatively has properties that are fundamental to both sides. In particular, the issue is discussed of whether the phenomena of “core cognition” have properties that are fundamental to both perception and cognition. Such cases would be candidates for conceptual perception which would impugn the joint in nature that this book argues for. The chapter starts with a discussion of the perception of causation, arguing that the evidence for perceptual representation of causation is now overwhelming and that “core cognition” of causation can be divided into the perceptual and the cognitive. Similar results apply to numerosity. The conclusion is that “core cognition” is a heterogeneous mixture of perception and cognition.

Max Black’s Objection to Mind-Body Identity, the Knowledge Argument and the Metaphenomenal Move1

Ned Block, Paper Paul Horwich, Brian Loar +4 more

Artificial Intelligence · 8 Apr 2015 · cited 0× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

In his famous article advocating mind-body identity, J.J.C. Smart (1959) considered an objection (Objection 3) that he says he thought was first put to him by Max Black. He says “…it is the most subtle of any of those I have considered, and the one which I am least confident of having satisfactorily met”. This argument, the “Property Dualism Argument, ” as it is often called, turns on much the same issue as Frank Jackson’s (1982, 1986) “Knowledge Argument”, or so I will argue. This paper is aimed at elaborating and refuting the Property Dualism Argument—or rather a family of Property Dualism Arguments-- and drawing some connections to the Knowledge Argument.2 I will also be examining John Perry’s (2001) book which discusses both Max Black’s argument and the Knowledge Argument, and some arguments drawn from Stephen White’s (1983) paper on the topic and some arguments inspired by…

THIS PDF FILE FOR PROMOTIONAL USE ONLY 6 Bodily Sensations as an Obstacle for Representationism

Ned Block

Sociology and Political Science · 26 Jul 2013 · cited 0× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

Representationism, 1 as I use the term, says that the phenomenal character of an experience just is its representational content, where that representational content can itself be understood and characterized without appeal to phenomenal character. Representationists seem to have a harder time handling pain than visual experience. (I say ‘seem ’ because in my view, representationists cannot actually handle either type of experience successfully, but I will put that claim to one side here.) I will argue that Michael Tye’s heroic attempt (this volume) at a representationist theory of pain, although ingenious and enlightening, does not adequately come to terms with the root of this difference. Representationism is in part an attempt to make an account of phenomenal character comport with G. E. Moore’s diaphanousness intuition, the idea of which is that when I try to introspect my…

To appear in The Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science Consciousness, Philosophical Issues about

Ned Block

Political Science and International Relations · 7 Feb 2008 · cited 0× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

There are a number of different matters that come under the heading of ‘consciousness’. One of them is phenomenality, the feeling of say a sensation of red or a pain, that is what it is like to have such a sensation or other experience. Another is reflection on phenomenality. Imagine two infants, both of which have pain, but only one of which has a thought about that pain. Both would have phenomenal states, but only the latter would have a state of reflexive consciousness. This entry will start with phenomenality, moving later to reflexivity and then to one other kind of consciousness. The Hard Problem of consciousness is how to explain a state of consciousness in terms of its neurological basis. If neural state N is the neural basis of the sensation of red, why is N the basis of that experience rather than some other experience or none at all? Chalmers (1996) distinguishes between the…

The Mind as the Software of the Brain

Ned Block

Artificial Intelligence · PhilPapers (PhilPapers Foundation) · 29 Jan 2008 · cited 0× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

this memory as in principle unlimited, but of course any actual machine has a finite memory. Now any computer with a finite amount of explicit storage can be simulated by a machine with a much larger CPU and no explicit storage, that is no registers and no tape. The way the simulation works is by using the extra states as a form of implicit memory. So, in principle, we could be simulated by a machine with no explicit memory at all. Consider, for example, the finite automaton diagrammed in Figure 7. The table shows it as having three states. The states, S 1 &apos;, S 2 &apos;, and S 3 &apos;, are listed across the top. The inputs are listed on the left side. Each box is in a column and a row that specifies what the machine does when it is in the state named at the top of the column, and when the input is the one listed at the side of the row. The top part of the box names the…

Mental Paint

Ned Block, Edited Martin Hahn, Bjorn Ramberg

Geometry and Topology · 22 Nov 2007 · cited 0× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

This paper is a defense of phenomenism against representationism, hence issues of reduction of the phenomenal to the functional or the cognitive won&apos;t play much of a role. First I will briefly discuss an internalist form of representationism, then I will go on to the main topic of the paper, externalist forms of the view. Internalism One form of representationism holds that the phenomenal character of experience is its &quot;narrow intentional content&quot;, intentional content that is &quot;in the head&quot; in Putnam&apos;s 1

Clarifying the conceptual dimensions of representation in neuroscience

Stephan Pohl, Edgar Y. Walker, David L. Barack +5 more

q-bio.NC · March 2024 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Despite the centrality of the notion of representation in neuroscience, the field lacks a unified framework for the concepts used to characterize representation, leading to disparate use of both terminology and measures associated with it. To offer clarification, we propose a core set of conceptual dimensions that characterize representations in neuroscience. These dimensions describe relations between a neural response, features that may be represented, and downstream effects of the neural response. A neural response may be shown to be sensitive or specific to a feature, invariant to other features, or functional (it is used downstream in the brain). We use information-theoretic measures to illustrate these conceptual dimensions and explain how they relate to data analysis methods such as correlational analyses, decoding and encoding models, representational similarity analysis, and…

Studying the neural representations of uncertainty

Edgar Y Walker, Stephan Pohl, Rachel N Denison +5 more

q-bio.NC · February 2022 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

The study of the brain's representations of uncertainty is a central topic in neuroscience. Unlike most quantities of which the neural representation is studied, uncertainty is a property of an observer's beliefs about the world, which poses specific methodological challenges. We analyze how the literature on the neural representations of uncertainty addresses those challenges and distinguish between "code-driven" and "correlational" approaches. Code-driven approaches make assumptions about the neural code for representing world states and the associated uncertainty. By contrast, correlational approaches search for relationships between uncertainty and neural activity without constraints on the neural representation of the world state that this uncertainty accompanies. To compare these two approaches, we apply several criteria for neural representations: sensitivity, specificity…