Author

Luke Whitbread

4 papers · 2022–2026

2022peak 3 in 20262026

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–4 of 4 RSS

Worst-Group Equalized Odds Regularization for Multi-Attribute Fair Medical Image Classification

Nikhil Cherian Kurian, Victor Caquilpan Parra, Abin Shoby +6 more

cs.LG · 19 May 2026 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Diagnostic performance in medical AI varies systematically across demographic groups, yet subgroup AUC can mask clinically important disparities. At a fixed inference-time operating point, some groups may exhibit over-diagnostic behaviour, characterized by elevated true and false positive rates, while others show under-diagnostic patterns with reduced true and false positive rates. These opposing tendencies can cancel in aggregate AUCs while producing meaningful inequities in clinical decision-making. Motivated by the need to assess and mitigate such disparities at the operating point and across multiple demographic attributes simultaneously, we propose a worst-group equalized-odds margin regularizer. The proposed regularizer explicitly targets subgroup-level deviations on both the true positive and false positive sides at inference. At each update, the method identifies subgroups…

Robust Mitigation of Age-Dependent Confounding Effects via Sample-Difficulty Decorrelation

Nikhil Cherian Kurian, Victor Caquilpan Parra, Abin Shoby +2 more

cs.CV · 19 May 2026 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Age dependent performance disparities in medical image classification often arise because age acts as a confounder, linking imaging morphology with disease prevalence. In practice, disparities can manifest as overdiagnosis at ages where disease prevalence is higher and underdiagnosis at ages where prevalence is lower, and can worsen under train test shifts in the age distribution. Conventional mitigation approaches that enforce strict age invariance may suppress diagnostically meaningful information encoded in age. We therefore propose a robust framework that mitigates the effects of age-dependent confounding by targeting spurious age linked trends rather than enforcing invariance. Following a warm-up phase, we characterize sample difficulty and model its age-dependent trends in a label-conditioned manner. We decorrelate age from dominant age difficulty trends using robust, Huber…

Denoising diffusion networks for normative modeling in neuroimaging

Luke Whitbread, Lyle J. Palmer, Mark Jenkinson

cs.LG · 24 Jan 2026 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Normative modeling estimates reference distributions of biological measures conditional on covariates, enabling centiles and clinically interpretable deviation scores to be derived. Most neuroimaging pipelines fit one model per imaging-derived phenotype (IDP), which scales well but discards multivariate dependence that may encode coordinated patterns. We propose denoising diffusion probabilistic models (DDPMs) as a unified conditional density estimator for tabular IDPs, from which univariate centiles and deviation scores are derived by sampling. We utilise two denoiser backbones: (i) a feature-wise linear modulation (FiLM) conditioned multilayer perceptron (MLP) and (ii) a tabular transformer with feature self-attention and intersample attention (SAINT), conditioning covariates through learned embeddings. We evaluate on a synthetic benchmark with heteroscedastic and multimodal age…

Uncertainty categories in medical image segmentation: a study of source-related diversity

Luke Whitbread, Mark Jenkinson

cs.LG · March 2022 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Measuring uncertainties in the output of a deep learning method is useful in several ways, such as in assisting with interpretation of the outputs, helping build confidence with end users, and for improving the training and performance of the networks. Several different methods have been proposed to estimate uncertainties, including those from epistemic (relating to the model used) and aleatoric (relating to the data) sources using test-time dropout and augmentation, respectively. Not only are these uncertainty sources different, but they are governed by parameter settings (e.g., dropout rate or type and level of augmentation) that establish even more distinct uncertainty categories. This work investigates how different the uncertainties are from these categories, for magnitude and spatial pattern, to empirically address the question of whether they provide usefully distinct information…