Author

Kyle Butts

7 papers · 2021–2026

2021peak 5 in 20212026

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–7 of 7 RSS

Difference-in-Differences Estimation with Spatial Spillovers

Kyle Butts

econ.EM · May 2021 · cited 69× · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Empirical work often uses treatment assigned following geographic boundaries. When the effects of treatment cross over borders, classical difference-in-differences estimation produces biased estimates for the average treatment effect. In this paper, I introduce a potential outcomes framework to model spillover effects and decompose the estimate's bias in two parts: (1) the control group no longer identifies the counterfactual trend because their outcomes are affected by treatment and (2) changes in treated units' outcomes reflect the effect of their own treatment status and the effect from the treatment status of 'close' units. I propose conditions for non-parametric identification that can remove both sources of bias and semi-parametrically estimate the spillover effects themselves including in settings with staggered treatment timing. To highlight the importance of spillover effects…

DID2S: Stata module to estimate a TWFE model using the two-stage difference-in-differences approach

Kyle Butts

Statistics and Probability · Statistical Software Components · 2021 · cited 3× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

did2s implements Two-Stage Difference-in-Differences by Gardner (2021). A TWFE model for outcomes is given by unit/group fixed effects, time fixed effects, treatment variable (or variables in the case of event study), and potentially covariates. To avoid the problems with OLS estimation of difference-in-differences/event-studies in the presence of staggered treatment adoption, this method proceeds in two stages: 1. This program estimates the unit/group fixed effects, time fixed effects, and potentially covariates using only untreated/not-yet-treated observations. This is used to predict counterfactual outcomes in all periods and residualize the observed outcome. 2. Then regress the residualized outcome on the treatment variable(s) to estimate the treatment effects.

{did2s}: Two-Stage Difference-in-Differences

Kyle Butts, John Gardner

econ.EM · September 2021 · cited 0× · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Recent work has highlighted the difficulties of estimating difference-in-differences models when treatment timing occurs at different times for different units. This article introduces the R package did2s which implements the estimator introduced in Gardner (2021). The article provides an approachable review of the underlying econometric theory and introduces the syntax for the function did2s. Further, the package introduces a function, event_study, that provides a common syntax for all the modern event-study estimators and plot_event_study to plot the results of each estimator.

fixest: A fast and feature-rich framework for econometric estimations in R

Laurent R. Bergé, Kyle Butts, Grant McDermott

econ.EM · January 2026 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

fixest is an R package for fast and flexible econometric estimation. It provides a unified framework for applied research, with comprehensive support for a diverse class of models: ordinary least squares, instrumental variables, generalized linear models, maximum likelihood, and difference-in-differences. The package particularly excels at fixed-effects estimation, supported by a novel fixed-point acceleration algorithm implemented in C++. This algorithm achieves rapid convergence across a variety of data contexts and enables efficient estimation of complex models, including those with varying slopes. An expressive formula interface facilitates multiple estimations, stepwise regressions, and variable interpolation in a single call. Users can adjust inference strategies on the fly, choosing from an array of built-in robust standard errors. The package also provides methods for…

Simple Difference-in-Differences Estimation in Fixed-T Panels

Nicholas Brown, Kyle Butts, Joakim Westerlund

econ.EM · January 2023 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

The present paper proposes a new treatment effects estimator that is valid when the number of time periods is small, and the parallel trends condition holds conditional on covariates and unobserved heterogeneity in the form of interactive fixed effects. The estimator also allow the control variables to be affected by treatment and it enables estimation of the resulting indirect effect on the outcome variable. The asymptotic properties of the estimator are established and their accuracy in small samples is investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. The empirical usefulness of the estimator is illustrated using as an example the effect of increased trade competition on firm markups in China.

Difference-in-Differences with Geocoded Microdata

Kyle Butts

econ.EM · 19 Oct 2021 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

This paper formalizes a common approach for estimating effects of treatment at a specific location using geocoded microdata. This estimator compares units immediately next to treatment (an inner-ring) to units just slightly further away (an outer-ring). I introduce intuitive assumptions needed to identify the average treatment effect among the affected units and illustrates pitfalls that occur when these assumptions fail. Since one of these assumptions requires knowledge of exactly how far treatment effects are experienced, I propose a new method that relaxes this assumption and allows for nonparametric estimation using partitioning-based least squares developed in Cattaneo et. al. (2019). Since treatment effects typically decay/change over distance, this estimator improves analysis by estimating a treatment effect curve as a function of distance from treatment. This is contrast to the…

Geographic Difference-in-Discontinuities

Kyle Butts

econ.EM · 16 Sep 2021 · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

A recent econometric literature has critiqued the use of regression discontinuities where administrative borders serves as the 'cutoff'. Identification in this context is difficult since multiple treatments can change at the cutoff and individuals can easily sort on either side of the border. This note extends the difference-in-discontinuities framework discussed in Grembi et. al. (2016) to a geographic setting. The paper formalizes the identifying assumptions in this context which will allow for the removal of time-invariant sorting and compound-treatments similar to the difference-in-differences methodology.