Author

Hugo Mercier

60 papers · 2005–2026

2005peak 9 in 20202026

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–25 of 60 RSS

Epistemic Vigilance

Dan Sperber, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz +4 more

Sociology and Political Science · Mind & Language · 20 Aug 2010 · cited 1,580× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Humans massively depend on communication with others, but this leaves them open to the risk of being accidentally or intentionally misinformed. To ensure that, despite this risk, communication remains advantageous, humans have, we claim, a suite of cognitive mechanisms for epistemic vigilance. Here we outline this claim and consider some of the ways in which epistemic vigilance works in mental and social life by surveying issues, research and theories in different domains of philosophy, linguistics, cognitive psychology and the social sciences.

Why do so few people share fake news? It hurts their reputation

Sacha Altay, Anne-Sophie Hacquin, Hugo Mercier

Sociology and Political Science · New Media & Society · 24 Nov 2020 · cited 211× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

In spite of the attractiveness of fake news stories, most people are reluctant to share them. Why? Four pre-registered experiments ( N = 3,656) suggest that sharing fake news hurt one’s reputation in a way that is difficult to fix, even for politically congruent fake news. The decrease in trust a source (media outlet or individual) suffers when sharing one fake news story against a background of real news is larger than the increase in trust a source enjoys when sharing one real news story against a background of fake news. A comparison with real-world media outlets showed that only sources sharing no fake news at all had similar trust ratings to mainstream media. Finally, we found that the majority of people declare they would have to be paid to share fake news, even when the news is politically congruent, and more so when their reputation is at stake.

Research note: Fighting misinformation or fighting for information?

Alberto Acerbi, Sacha Altay, Hugo Mercier

Sociology and Political Science · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · 12 Jan 2022 · cited 121× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

A wealth of interventions have been devised to reduce belief in fake news or the tendency to share such news. By contrast, interventions aimed at increasing trust in reliable news sources have received less attention. In this article we show that, given the very limited prevalence of misinformation (including fake news), interventions aimed at reducing acceptance or spread of such news are bound to have very small effects on the overall quality of the information environment, especially compared to interventions aimed at increasing trust in reliable news sources. To make this argument, we simulate the effect that such interventions have on a global information score, which increases when people accept reliable information and decreases when people accept misinformation.

Information delivered by a chatbot has a positive impact on COVID-19 vaccines attitudes and intentions.

Sacha Altay, Anne-Sophie Hacquin, Coralie Chevallier +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · 28 Oct 2021 · cited 81× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The Coronavirus disease; COVID-19 vaccines will not end the pandemic if they stay in freezers. In many countries, such as France, COVID-19 vaccines hesitancy is high. It is crucial that governments make it as easy as possible for people who want to be vaccinated to do so, but also that they devise communication strategies to address the concerns of vaccine hesitant individuals. We introduce and test on 701 French participants a novel messaging strategy: A chatbot that answers people's questions about COVID-19 vaccines. We find that interacting with this chatbot for a few minutes significantly increases people's intentions to get vaccinated (ß = 0.12) and has a positive impact on their attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination (ß = 0.23). Our results suggest that a properly scripted and regularly updated chatbot could offer a powerful resource to help fight hesitancy toward COVID-19…

Reasoning Is for Arguing: Understanding the Successes and Failures of Deliberation

Hugo Mercier, Hélène Landemore

Safety Research · Political Psychology · 27 Mar 2012 · cited 78× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Theoreticians of deliberative democracy have sometimes found it hard to relate to the seemingly contradictory experimental results produced by psychologists and political scientists. We suggest that this problem may be alleviated by inserting a layer of psychological theory between the empirical results and the normative political theory. In particular, we expose the argumentative theory of reasoning that makes the observed pattern of findings more coherent. According to this theory, individual reasoning mechanisms work best when used to produce and evaluate arguments during a public deliberation. It predicts that when diverse opinions are discussed, group reasoning will outperform individual reasoning. It also predicts that individuals have a strong confirmation bias. When people reason either alone or with like‐minded peers, this confirmation bias leads them to reinforce their initial…

“If This account is True, It is Most Enormously Wonderful”: Interestingness-If-True and the Sharing of True and False News

Sacha Altay, Emma de Araujo, Hugo Mercier

Sociology and Political Science · Digital Journalism · 24 Aug 2021 · cited 77× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Why would people share news they think might not be accurate? We identify a factor that, alongside accuracy, drives the sharing of true and fake news: the ‘interestingness-if-true’ of a piece of news. In three pre-registered experiments (N = 904), participants were presented with a series of true and fake news, and asked to rate the accuracy of the news, how interesting the news would be if it were true, and how likely they would be to share it. Participants were more willing to share news they found more interesting-if-true, as well as news they deemed more accurate. They deemed fake news less accurate but more interesting-if-true than true news, and were more likely to share true news than fake news. As expected, interestingness-if-true differed from interestingness and accuracy, and had good face validity. Higher trust in mass media was associated with a greater ability to discern…

Misinformation reloaded? Fears about the impact of generative AI on misinformation are overblown

Felix M. Simon, Sacha Altay, Hugo Mercier

Sociology and Political Science · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · 13 Oct 2023 · cited 76× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Many observers of the current explosion of generative AI worry about its impact on our information environment, with concerns being raised about the increased quantity, quality, and personalization of misinformation. We assess these arguments with evidence from communication studies, cognitive science, and political science. We argue that current concerns about the effects of generative AI on the misinformation landscape are overblown.

Natural-Born Arguers: Teaching How to Make the Best of Our Reasoning Abilities

Hugo Mercier, Maarten Boudry, Fabio Paglieri +1 more

Education · Educational Psychologist · 6 Sep 2016 · cited 58× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

We summarize the argumentative theory of reasoning, which claims that the main function of reasoning is to argue. In this theory, argumentation is seen as being essentially cooperative (people have to listen to others' arguments and be ready to change their mind) but with an adversarial dimension (their goal as argument producers is to convince). Consistent with this theory, the experimental literature shows that solitary reasoning is biased and lazy, whereas reasoning in group discussion produces good results, provided some conditions are met. We formulate recommendations for improving reasoning performance, mainly, to make people argue more and better by creating felicitous conditions for group discussion. We also make some suggestions for improving solitary reasoning, in particular to maximize students' exposure to arguments challenging their positions. Teaching people about the…

Sharp rise in vaccine hesitancy in a large and representative sample of the French population: reasons for vaccine hesitancy.

Anne-Sophie Hacquin, Sacha Altay, Emma de Araujo +2 more

Health · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · 16 Nov 2020 · cited 53× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

A safe and effective COVID-19 vaccine is our only hope to decisively stop the spread of the SARS-CoV-2. But a vaccine will only be fully effective if a significant share of the population agrees to get it. Five consecutive surveys of a large, nationally representative sample (N = 1000 for each wave) surveyed attitudes towards a future COVID-19 vaccine in France from May 2020 to October 2020. We found that COVID-19 vaccine refusal has steadily increased, reaching an all-time high with only 23% of participants willing to probably or certainly take a future COVID-19 vaccine in September 2020. Vaccine hesitant individuals are more likely to be women, young, less educated, to vote at the political extremes, to be dissatisfied with the government’s response to the COVID-19 crisis, and to feel less at risk of COVID-19. The reasons why French people would refuse to take the COVID-19 vaccine are…

Talking it out with others vs. deliberation within and the law of group polarization

Hélène Landemore, Hugo Mercier

Communication · Scholarly Commons (University of Pennsylvania) · 8 Feb 2021 · cited 47× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

This paper argues that a new psychological theory—the argumentative theory of reasoning—provides theoretical support for the discursive, dialogical ideal of democratic deliberation. It converges, in particular, with deliberative democrats’ predictions about the positive epistemic properties of talking things out with others. The paper further considers two influential objections to democratic deliberation: first, that “deliberation within” rather than deliberation with others carries most of the burden in terms of changing people’s minds; and second, that the so-called “law of group polarization” casts serious doubts on the value of democratic deliberation and, more generally, the ideal of deliberative democracy.

Argumentation and the diffusion of counter-intuitive beliefs.

Nicolas Claidière, Emmanuel Trouche, Hugo Mercier

Cultural Studies · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · 11 May 2017 · cited 47× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Research in cultural evolution has focused on the spread of intuitive or minimally counterintuitive beliefs. However, some very counterintuitive beliefs can also spread successfully, at least in some communities-scientific theories being the most prominent example. We suggest that argumentation could be an important factor in the spread of some very counterintuitive beliefs. A first experiment demonstrates that argumentation enables the spread of the counterintuitive answer to a reasoning problem in large discussion groups, whereas this spread is limited or absent when participants can show their answers to each other but cannot discuss. A series of experiments using the technique of repeated transmission show that, in the case of the counterintuitive belief studied: (a) arguments can help spread this belief without loss; (b) conformist bias does not help spread this belief; and (c)…

Argumentation: Its adaptiveness and efficacy

Hugo Mercier, Dan Sperber

Safety Research · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · 29 Mar 2011 · cited 42× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract Having defended the usefulness of our definition of reasoning, we stress that reasoning is not only for convincing but also for evaluating arguments, and that as such it has an epistemic function. We defend the evidence supporting the theory against several challenges: People are good informal arguers, they reason better in groups, and they have a confirmation bias. Finally, we consider possible extensions, first in terms of process-level theories of reasoning, and second in the effects of reasoning outside the lab.

Willingness to transmit and the spread of pseudoscientific beliefs

Hugo Mercier, Yoshimasa Majima, Helena Miton

Sociology and Political Science · Applied Cognitive Psychology · 17 Apr 2018 · cited 33× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Summary Pseudoscientific beliefs are widespread and can be damaging. If several studies have examined the factors leading people to accept pseudoscientific beliefs, no attention has been paid to the factors contributing to people's willingness to transmit these beliefs. To test whether the willingness to transmit pseudoscientific beliefs contributes to their spread, independent of their believability, we asked participants to rate statements corresponding either to pseudoscientific beliefs (Myths), or to their (correct) negations (Non‐Myths). Statements were rated on believability, on how willing participants would be to transmit them, and on how knowledgeable they would make someone who produces them. Results revealed that participants who believed in Myths were more willing to transmit them than the participants who believed in Non‐Myths were willing to transmit Non‐Myths. A potential…

Framing messages for vaccination supporters.

Sacha Altay, Hugo Mercier

Health · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · 9 Apr 2020 · cited 32× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Efficiently communicating information on vaccination is crucial to maintaining a high level of immunization coverage, but it implies finding the right content for the right audience. Provaccination individuals, who represent the majority of the population, and who have been neglected in the literature, could play an important role relaying provaccination messages through informal discussions, if only these messages are (a) found plausible, (b) remembered, and (c) shared. We conducted 7 experiments on 2,761 provaccination online participants (United States and United Kingdom), testing whether the valence of a statement (positive or negative) and its rhetorical orientation (pro- or antivaccine) affected these 3 steps. Participants deemed more plausible, were more willing to transmit (and actually transmitted more), but did not remember positively framed statements better. Provaccination…

Relevance Is Socially Rewarded, But Not at the Price of Accuracy

Sacha Altay, Hugo Mercier

Sociology and Political Science · Evolutionary Psychology · 2020 · cited 23× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Selecting good sources of information is a critical skill to navigate our highly social world. To evaluate the epistemic reputation of potential sources, the main criterion should be the relevance of the information they provide us. In two online experiments ( N = 801), we found that receivers are more thankful toward, deem more competent, and are more likely to request information in the future from sources of more relevant messages—if they know the message to be accurate or deem it plausible. To prevent sources from presenting information as more relevant than it is in order to improve their reputation, receivers lower the reputation of sources sending messages that are more relevant-if-true, if they know the message to be inaccurate. Our research sheds light on the reputational trade-offs involved in choosing what information to communicate and helps explain transmission patterns…

Vigilant conservatism in evaluating communicated information

Emmanuel Trouche, Petter Johansson, Lars Häll +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · PLoS ONE · 10 Jan 2018 · cited 21× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

In the absence of other information, people put more weight on their own opinion than on the opinion of others: they are conservative. Several proximal mechanisms have been suggested to account for this finding. One of these mechanisms is that people cannot access reasons for other people's opinions, but they can access the reasons for their own opinions-whether they are the actual reasons that led them to hold the opinions (rational access to reasons), or post-hoc constructions (biased access to reasons). In four experiments, participants were asked to provide an opinion, and then faced with another participant's opinion and asked if they wanted to revise their initial opinion. Some questions were manipulated so that the advice participants were receiving was in fact their own opinion, while what they thought was their own opinion was in fact not. In all experiments, the participants…

Analytical Democratic Theory: A Microfoundational Approach

Henry Farrell, Hugo Mercier, Melissa Schwartzberg

Sociology and Political Science · American Political Science Review · August 2022 · cited 17× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

A prominent and publicly influential literature challenges the quality of democratic decision making, drawing on political science findings with specific claims about the ubiquity of cognitive bias to lament citizens’ incompetence. A competing literature in democratic theory defends the wisdom of crowds, drawing on a cluster of models in support of the capacity of ordinary citizens to produce correct outcomes. In this Letter, we draw on recent findings in psychology to demonstrate that the former literature is based on outdated and erroneous claims and that the latter is overly sanguine about the circumstances that yield reliable collective decision making. By contrast, “interactionist” scholarship shows how individual-level biases are not devastating for group problem solving, given appropriate conditions. This provides possible microfoundations for a broader research agenda similar to…

Improving preventive health behaviors in the COVID-19 crisis: a messaging intervention in a large nationally representative sample

Anne-Sophie Hacquin, Hugo Mercier, Coralie Chevallier

Sociology and Political Science · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · 4 Sep 2020 · cited 13× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Public health communication play an important role in the fight against COVID-19. We used five well-established psychological levers to improve on the efficacy of two posters used by the French authorities (one on protective behaviors and one on proper handwashing). The five levers were: simplification (streamlining the posters), sunk costs (emphasizing the costs already paid to fight the pandemic), morality (emphasizing the duty to help others), self-protection (emphasizing the personal risks), and disgust (pointing out and illustrating that not following the protective behaviors or proper handwashing had consequences that should trigger disgust). We tested on a large (N = 3000) nationally representative French sample whether versions of the posters using these levers, compared to a control condition, were clearer, better recalled, and increased people’s intention to follow the…

Obstacles to the spread of unintuitive beliefs

Hugo Mercier, Yoshimasa Majima, Nicolas Claidière +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Evolutionary Human Sciences · 2019 · cited 12× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Many socially significant beliefs are unintuitive, from the harmlessness of GMOs to the efficacy of vaccination, and they are acquired via deference toward individuals who are more confident, more competent or a majority. In the two-step flow model of communication, a first group of individuals acquires some beliefs through deference and then spreads these beliefs more broadly. Ideally, these individuals should be able to explain why they deferred to a given source - to provide arguments from expertise - and others should find these arguments convincing. We test these requirements using a perceptual task with participants from the US and Japan. In Experiment 1, participants were provided with first-hand evidence that they should defer to an expert, leading a majority of participants to adopt the expert's answer. However, when attempting to pass on this answer, only a minority of those…

Evidentiality and flexibility of source reporting

Thomas Castelain, Simeon Floyd, Hugo Mercier

Sociology and Political Science · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · October 2019 · cited 10× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The reporting of the sources of our statements—whether we have, e.g., seen something or been told something—plays an important role in communication. The inaccurate reporting of sources is often associated with the spread of inaccurate beliefs, as when rumors are attributed to a non-existent credible source. Experiments have revealed that participants display a substantial amount of flexibility in the reporting of sources, in particular by attributing to themselves ideas they have acquired from others. However, these participants belonged to large-scale societies, and they spoke languages without grammatical evidential marking. Both factors might increase flexibility in source reporting. To test whether members of small-scale societies speaking languages with evidential marking also display flexibility in source reporting, we conducted two experiments with Quichua and Cha’palaa speakers…

It happened to a friend of a friend: inaccurate source reporting in rumour diffusion

Sacha Altay, Nicolas Claidière, Hugo Mercier

Sociology and Political Science · Evolutionary Human Sciences · 2020 · cited 9× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

: e.g. when told by a friend that 'a friend told me …' they shared the rumour as coming from 'a friend' instead of 'a friend of friend'. Source shortening and reliance on credible sources boosted rumour propagation by increasing the rumours' perceived plausibility and participants' willingness to share them. Models show that, in linear transmission chains, the generic friend attribution dominates, but that allowing each individual to be exposed to the rumour from several sources enables the maintenance of the credible friend of a friend attribution.

It Happened to a Friend of a Friend: Inaccurate Source Reporting in Rumor Diffusion.

Sacha Altay, Nicolas Claidière, Hugo Mercier

Sociology and Political Science · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 25 Jan 2020 · cited 8× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

People often attribute rumours to an individual in a knowledgeable position two steps removed from them (a credible friend of a friend), such as “my friend’s father, who’s a cop, told me about a serial killer in town.” Little is known about the influence of such attributions on rumour propagation, or how they are maintained when the rumour is transmitted. In four studies (N = 1824) participants exposed to a rumour and asked to transmit it overwhelmingly attributed the rumour either to a credible friend of a friend, or to a generic friend (e.g. “a friend told me about a serial killer in town”). In both cases, participants engaged in source shortening: e.g., when told by a friend that “a friend told me...” they shared the rumour as coming from “a friend” instead of “a friend of friend.” Source shortening and reliance on credible sources boosted rumour propagation by increasing the…

Some Clarifications about the Argumentative Theory of Reasoning. A Reply to Santibáñez Yañez (2012).

Hugo Mercier

Artificial Intelligence · Informal Logic · 13 Jun 2012 · cited 8× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

In “Mercier and Sperber’s Argumentative Theory of Reasoning: From Psychology of Reasoning to Argumentation Studies” (2012) Santibáñez Yañez offers constructive comments and criticisms of the argumentative theory of reasoning. The purpose of this reply is twofold. First, it seeks to clarify two points broached by Yanez: (1) the relation between reasoning (in this specific theory) and dual process accounts in general and (2) the benefits that can be derived from reasoning and argumentation (again, in this specific theory). Second, it suggests one domain—the categorization of arguments—in which argumentation studies and the argumentative theory of reasoning could usefully complement each other to yield a better understanding of the processes of argumentation.

Toward an Efficient and Accurate AAM Fitting on Appearance Varying Faces

Hugo Mercier, Jean Peyras, Patrice Dalle

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 28 Apr 2006 · cited 8× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Automatic extraction of facial feature deformations (either due to identity change or expression) is a challenging task and could be the base of a facial expression interpretation system. We use active appearance models and the simultaneous inverse compositional algorithm to extract facial deformations as a starting point and propose a modified version addressing the problem of facial appearance variation in an efficient manner. To consider important variation of facial appearance is a first step toward a realistic facial feature deformation extraction system able to adapt to a new face or to track a face with changing video conditions. Moreover, in order to test fittings, we design an experiment protocol that takes human inaccuracies into account when building a ground truth.

Robust Improvements on Reasoning Performance Following Discussion in Japan

Mariko Boku, Hiroshi Yama, Hugo Mercier

Artificial Intelligence · Japanese Psychological Research · 12 Oct 2017 · cited 7× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract Group discussion significantly improves performance on intellective problems. However, most experiments have been conducted in Western cultures. Cross‐cultural psychology suggests that members of Eastern cultures might be less likely to benefit from group discussion. One experiment in Japan suggested that this was not the case, but this experiment suffered from some limitations. To address these limitations, Japanese participants were asked to solve an intellective task four times: individually (pre‐test), in small discussion groups (test), individually again (transfer task, post‐test), and individually after a delay (delayed post‐test). The results revealed a robust improvement during group discussion. Groups in which at least one member had found the correct answer individually agreed on it during the discussion. Moreover, and in contrast with results obtained in Western…