Author

Hugo Bodory

7 papers · 2016–2024

2016peak 2 in 20182024

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–7 of 7 RSS

Evaluating (weighted) dynamic treatment effects by double machine learning

Hugo Bodory, Martin Huber, Lukáš Lafférs

econ.EM · December 2020 · cited 124× · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

We consider evaluating the causal effects of dynamic treatments, i.e. of multiple treatment sequences in various periods, based on double machine learning to control for observed, time-varying covariates in a data-driven way under a selection-on-observables assumption. To this end, we make use of so-called Neyman-orthogonal score functions, which imply the robustness of treatment effect estimation to moderate (local) misspecifications of the dynamic outcome and treatment models. This robustness property permits approximating outcome and treatment models by double machine learning even under high dimensional covariates and is combined with data splitting to prevent overfitting. In addition to effect estimation for the total population, we consider weighted estimation that permits assessing dynamic treatment effects in specific subgroups, e.g. among those treated in the first treatment…

The Finite Sample Performance of Inference Methods for Propensity Score Matching and Weighting Estimators

Hugo Bodory, Lorenzo Camponovo, Martin Huber +1 more

Statistics and Probability · Journal of Business and Economic Statistics · 21 May 2018 · cited 51× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

This article investigates the finite sample properties of a range of inference methods for propensity score-based matching and weighting estimators frequently applied to evaluate the average treatment effect on the treated. We analyze both asymptotic approximations and bootstrap methods for computing variances and confidence intervals in our simulation designs, which are based on German register data and U.S. survey data. We vary the design w.r.t. treatment selectivity, effect heterogeneity, share of treated, and sample size. The results suggest that in general, theoretically justified bootstrap procedures (i.e., wild bootstrapping for pair matching and standard bootstrapping for “smoother” treatment effect estimators) dominate the asymptotic approximations in terms of coverage rates for both matching and weighting estimators. Most findings are robust across simulation designs and…

High Resolution Treatment Effects Estimation: Uncovering Effect Heterogeneities with the Modified Causal Forest

Hugo Bodory, Hannah Busshoff, Michael Lechner

Statistics and Probability · Entropy · 28 Jul 2022 · cited 15× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

There is great demand for inferring causal effect heterogeneity and for open-source statistical software, which is readily available for practitioners. The mcf package is an open-source Python package that implements Modified Causal Forest (mcf), a causal machine learner. We replicate three well-known studies in the fields of epidemiology, medicine, and labor economics to demonstrate that our mcf package produces aggregate treatment effects, which align with previous results, and in addition, provides novel insights on causal effect heterogeneity. For all resolutions of treatment effects estimation, which can be identified, the mcf package provides inference. We conclude that the mcf constitutes a practical and extensive tool for a modern causal heterogeneous effects analysis.

The causalweight package for causal inference in R

Hugo Bodory, Martin Huber

Statistics and Probability · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · March 2018 · cited 11× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

We describe R package âcausalweightâ for causal inference based on inverse probability weighting (IPW). The âcausalweightâ package offers a range of semiparametric methods for treatment or impact evaluation and mediation analysis, which incorporates intermediate outcomes for investigating causal mechanisms. Depending on the method, identification relies on selection on observables assumptions or on instrumental variables when selection is on unobservables, approaches that may also be applied to tackle non-random outcome attrition and sample selection. Inference is based on the bootstrap.

A wild bootstrap algorithm for propensity score matching estimators

Martin Huber, Lorenzo Camponovo, Hugo Bodory +1 more

Statistics and Probability · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · July 2016 · cited 5× · OpenAlex ↗ · more like this ·

We introduce a wild bootstrap algorithm for the approximation of the sampling distribution of pair or one-to-many propensity score matching estimators. Unlike the conventional iid bootstrap, the proposed wild bootstrap approach does not construct bootstrap samples by randomly resampling from the observations with uniform weights. Instead, it fixes the covariates and constructs the bootstrap approximation by perturbing the martingale representation for matching estimators. We also conduct a simulation study in which the suggested wild bootstrap performs well even when the sample size is relatively small. Finally, we provide an empirical illustration by analyzing an information intervention in rural development programs.

Enabling Decision-Making with the Modified Causal Forest: Policy Trees for Treatment Assignment

Hugo Bodory, Federica Mascolo, Michael Lechner

econ.EM · 4 Jun 2024 · cited 3× · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

Decision-making plays a pivotal role in shaping outcomes in various disciplines, such as medicine, economics, and business. This paper provides guidance to practitioners on how to implement a decision tree designed to address treatment assignment policies using an interpretable and non-parametric algorithm. Our Policy Tree is motivated on the method proposed by Zhou, Athey, and Wager (2023), distinguishing itself for the policy score calculation, incorporating constraints, and handling categorical and continuous variables. We demonstrate the usage of the Policy Tree for multiple, discrete treatments on data sets from different fields. The Policy Tree is available in Python's open-source package mcf (Modified Causal Forest).

The finite sample performance of instrumental variable-based estimators of the Local Average Treatment Effect when controlling for covariates

Hugo Bodory, Martin Huber, Michael Lechner

econ.EM · 14 Dec 2022 · cited 0× · arXiv ↗ · more like this ·

This paper investigates the finite sample performance of a range of parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric instrumental variable estimators when controlling for a fixed set of covariates to evaluate the local average treatment effect. Our simulation designs are based on empirical labor market data from the US and vary in several dimensions, including effect heterogeneity, instrument selectivity, instrument strength, outcome distribution, and sample size. Among the estimators and simulations considered, non-parametric estimation based on the random forest (a machine learner controlling for covariates in a data-driven way) performs competitive in terms of the average coverage rates of the (bootstrap-based) 95% confidence intervals, while also being relatively precise. Non-parametric kernel regression as well as certain versions of semi-parametric radius matching on the propensity…