Trial of Labour after Previous Caesarean Section: Obstetric Outcome
S. Chua, Sabaratnam Arulkumaran, Piara Singh. B.Sc +1 more
EDITORIAL COMMENT: Recently we have accepted a number of papers on trial of scar because of the importance of avoiding unnecessary repeat Caesarean sections. This paper reports impeccable results from Singapore but readers should heed the authors' warnings regarding the need for careful assessment before and during labour, especially when augmentation with oxytocin is employed. In this series trial of labour was permitted when the previous Caesarean was indicated for by cephalopelvic disproportion. It is not enough to monitor labour electronically in such patients — when uterine rupture occurs it can do so suddenly without warning deterioration in fetal condition — an experienced clinician should review these patients regularly during labour, especially when oxytocin augmentation is planned because of uterine dysfunction. Cephalopelvic disproportion may be unrecognized particularly if…