Author

Adam D. Galinsky

126 papers · 2000–2026

2000peak 14 in 20162026

Frequent co-authors

Papers

showing 1–25 of 126 RSS

From Power to Action.

Adam D. Galinsky, Deborah H. Gruenfeld, Joe C. Magee

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2003 · cited 1,669× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Three experiments investigated the hypothesis that power increases an action orientation in the power holder, even in contexts where power is not directly experienced. In Experiment 1, participants who possessed structural power in a group task were more likely to take a card in a simulated game of blackjack than those who lacked power. In Experiment 2, participants primed with high power were more likely to act against an annoying stimulus (a fan) in the environment, suggesting that the experience of power leads to the performance of goal-directed behavior. In Experiment 3, priming high power led to action in a social dilemma regardless of whether that action had prosocial or antisocial consequences. The effects of priming power are discussed in relation to the broader literature on conceptual and mind-set priming.

8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and Status

Joe C. Magee, Adam D. Galinsky

Sociology and Political Science · Academy of Management Annals · 2008 · cited 1,536× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Hierarchy is such a defining and pervasive feature of organizations that its forms and basic functions are often taken for granted in organizational research. In this review, we revisit some basic psychological and sociological elements of hierarchy and argue that status and power are two important yet distinct bases of hierarchical differentiation. We first define power and status and distinguish our definitions from previous conceptualizations. We then integrate a number of different literatures to explain why status and power hierarchies tend to be self‐reinforcing. Power, related to one’s control over valued resources, transforms individual psychology such that the powerful think and act in ways that lead to the retention and acquisition of power. Status, related to the respect one has in the eyes of others, generates expectations for behavior and opportunities for advancement that…

Power, optimism, and risk‐taking

Cameron Anderson, Adam D. Galinsky

Sociology and Political Science · European Journal of Social Psychology · July 2006 · cited 1,191× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract Five studies investigated the hypotheses that the sense of power increases optimism in perceiving risks and leads to more risky behavior. In Studies 1 and 2, individuals with a higher generalized sense of power and those primed with a high‐power mind‐set were more optimistic in their perceptions of risk. Study 3 primed the concept of power nonconsciously and found that both power and gain/loss frame had independent effects on risk preferences. In Study 4, those primed with a high‐power mind‐set were more likely to act in a risk‐seeking fashion (i.e., engage in unprotected sex). In Study 5, individuals with a higher sense of power in a face‐to‐face negotiation took more risks by divulging their interests. The effects of power on risk‐taking were mediated by optimistic risk perceptions and not by self‐efficacy beliefs. Further, these effects were attenuated when the high‐power…

Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism.

Adam D. Galinsky, Gordon B. Moskowitz

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2000 · cited 1,108× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Using 3 experiments, the authors explored the role of perspective-taking in debiasing social thought. In the 1st 2 experiments, perspective-taking was contrasted with stereotype suppression as a possible strategy for achieving stereotype control. In Experiment 1, perspective-taking decreased stereotypic biases on both a conscious and a nonconscious task. In Experiment 2, perspective-taking led to both decreased stereotyping and increased overlap between representations of the self and representations of the elderly, suggesting activation and application of the self-concept in judgments of the elderly. In Experiment 3, perspective-taking reduced evidence of in-group bias in the minimal group paradigm by increasing evaluations of the out-group. The role of self-other overlap in producing prosocial outcomes and the separation of the conscious, explicit effects from the nonconscious…

Power reduces the press of the situation: Implications for creativity, conformity, and dissonance.

Adam D. Galinsky, Joe C. Magee, Deborah H. Gruenfeld +2 more

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2008 · cited 888× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Although power is often conceptualized as the capacity to influence others, the current research explores whether power psychologically protects people from influence. In contrast to classic social psychological research demonstrating the strength of the situation in directing attitudes, expressions, and intentions, 5 experiments (using experiential primes, semantic primes, and role manipulations of power) demonstrate that the powerful (a) generate creative ideas that are less influenced by salient examples, (b) express attitudes that conform less to the expressed opinions of others, (c) are more influenced by their own social value orientation relative to the reputation of a negotiating opponent, and (d) perceive greater choice in making counterattitudinal statements. This last experiment illustrates that power is not always psychologically liberating; it can create internal conflict…

First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus.

Adam D. Galinsky, Thomas Mussweiler

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2001 · cited 804× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Three experiments explored the role of first offers, perspective-taking, and negotiator self-focus in determining distributive outcomes in a negotiation. Across 3 experiments, whichever party, the buyer or seller, made the 1st offer obtained a better outcome. In addition, 1st offers were a strong predictor of final settlement prices. However, when the negotiator who did not make a 1st offer focused on information that was inconsistent with the implications of the opponent's 1st offer, the advantageous effect of making the 1st offer was eliminated: Thinking about one's opponent's alternatives to the negotiation (Experiment 1), one's opponent's reservation price (Experiment 2), or one's own target (Experiment 3) all negated the effect of 1st offers on outcomes. These effects occurred for both face-to-face negotiations and E-mail negotiations. Implications for negotiations and…

Power and the objectification of social targets.

Deborah H. Gruenfeld, M. Ena Inesi, Joe C. Magee +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2008 · cited 767× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Objectification has been defined historically as a process of subjugation whereby people, like objects, are treated as means to an end. The authors hypothesized that objectification is a response to social power that involves approaching useful social targets regardless of the value of their other human qualities. Six studies found that under conditions of power, approach toward a social target was driven more by the target's usefulness, defined in terms of the perceiver's goals, than in low-power and baseline conditions. This instrumental response to power, which was linked to the presence of an active goal, was observed using multiple instantiations of power, different measures of approach, a variety of goals, and several types of instrumental and noninstrumental target attributes. Implications for research on the psychology of power, automatic goal pursuit, and self-objectification…

Why It Pays to Get Inside the Head of Your Opponent

Adam D. Galinsky, William W. Maddux, Debra Gilin +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Psychological Science · April 2008 · cited 716× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The current research explored whether two related yet distinct social competencies -- perspective taking (the cognitive capacity to consider the world from another individual's viewpoint) and empathy (the ability to connect emotionally with another individual) -- have differential effects in negotiations. Across three studies, using both individual difference measures and experimental manipulations, we found that perspective taking increased individuals' ability to discover hidden agreements and to both create and claim resources at the bargaining table. However, empathy did not prove nearly as advantageous and at times was detrimental to discovering a possible deal and achieving individual profit. These results held regardless of whether the interaction was a negotiation in which a prima facie solution was not possible or a multiple-issue negotiation that required discovering mutually…

Battle of the sexes: Gender stereotype confirmation and reactance in negotiations.

Laura J. Kray, Leigh Thompson, Adam D. Galinsky

Gender Studies · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2001 · cited 635× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The authors examined how gender stereotypes affect negotiation performance. Men outperformed women when the negotiation was perceived as diagnostic of ability (Experiment 1) or the negotiation was linked to gender-specific traits (Experiment 2), suggesting the threat of negative stereotype confirmation hurt women's performance relative to men. The authors hypothesized that men and women confirm gender stereotypes when they are activated implicitly, but when stereotypes are explicitly activated, people exhibit stereotype reactance, or the tendency to behave in a manner inconsistent with a stereotype. Experiment 3 confirmed this hypothesis. In Experiment 4, the authors examined the cognitive processes involved in stereotype reactance and the conditions under which cooperative behaviors between men and women can be promoted at the bargaining table (by activating a shared identity that…

Power, Propensity to Negotiate, and Moving First in Competitive Interactions

Joe C. Magee, Adam D. Galinsky, Deborah H. Gruenfeld

Sociology and Political Science · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · 26 Jan 2007 · cited 470× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Five experiments investigated how the possession and experience of power affects the initiation of competitive interaction. In Experiments 1a and 1b, high-power individuals displayed a greater propensity to initiate a negotiation than did low-power individuals. Three additional experiments showed that power increased the likelihood of making the first move in a variety of competitive interactions. In Experiment 2, participants who were semantically primed with power were nearly 4 times as likely as participants in a control condition to choose to make the opening arguments in a debate competition scenario. In Experiment 3, negotiators with strong alternatives to a negotiation were more than 3 times as likely to spontaneously express an intention to make the first offer compared to participants who lacked any alternatives. Experiment 4 showed that high-power negotiators were more likely…

Perspective taking combats automatic expressions of racial bias.

Andrew R. Todd, Galen V. Bodenhausen, Jennifer A. Richeson +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 8 Mar 2011 · cited 462× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Five experiments investigated the hypothesis that perspective taking--actively contemplating others' psychological experiences--attenuates automatic expressions of racial bias. Across the first 3 experiments, participants who adopted the perspective of a Black target in an initial context subsequently exhibited more positive automatic interracial evaluations, with changes in automatic evaluations mediating the effect of perspective taking on more deliberate interracial evaluations. Furthermore, unlike other bias-reduction strategies, the interracial positivity resulting from perspective taking was accompanied by increased salience of racial inequalities (Experiment 3). Perspective taking also produced stronger approach-oriented action tendencies toward Blacks (but not Whites; Experiment 4). A final experiment revealed that face-to-face interactions with perspective takers were rated…

Illusory Control

Nathanael J. Fast, Deborah H. Gruenfeld, Niro Sivanathan +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Psychological Science · 26 Feb 2009 · cited 380× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Three experiments demonstrated that the experience of power leads to an illusion of personal control. Regardless of whether power was experientially primed ( Experiments 1 and 3 ) or manipulated through roles (manager vs. subordinate; Experiment 2 ), it led to perceived control over outcomes that were beyond the reach of the power holder. Furthermore, this illusory control mediated the influence of power on several self-enhancement and approach-related outcomes reported in the power literature, including optimism ( Experiment 2 ), self-esteem ( Experiment 3 ), and action orientation ( Experiment 3 ). These results demonstrate the theoretical importance of perceived control as a generative cause of and driving force behind many of power's far-reaching effects. A fourth experiment ruled out an alternative explanation: that positive mood, rather than illusory control, is at the root of…

Getting the most out of living abroad: Biculturalism and integrative complexity as key drivers of creative and professional success.

Carmit T. Tadmor, Adam D. Galinsky, William W. Maddux

Communication · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 23 Jul 2012 · cited 373× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The current research investigated how patterns of home and host cultural identification can explain which individuals who have lived abroad achieve the greatest creative and professional success. We hypothesized that individuals who identified with both their home and host cultures (i.e., biculturals) would show enhanced creativity and professional success compared with individuals who identified with only a single culture (i.e., assimilated and separated individuals). Further, we expected that these effects would be driven by biculturals' greater levels of integrative complexity, an information processing capacity that involves considering and combining multiple perspectives. Two studies demonstrated that biculturals exhibited more fluency, flexibility, and novelty on a creative uses task (Study 1) and produced more innovations at work (Study 2) than did assimilated or separated…

Power Increases Hypocrisy

Joris Lammers, Diederik A. Stapel, Adam D. Galinsky

Sociology and Political Science · Psychological Science · 16 Apr 2010 · cited 371× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

In five studies, we explored whether power increases moral hypocrisy (i.e., imposing strict moral standards on other people but practicing less strict moral behavior oneself). In Experiment 1, compared with the powerless, the powerful condemned other people's cheating more, but also cheated more themselves. In Experiments 2 through 4, the powerful were more strict in judging other people's moral transgressions than in judging their own transgressions. A final study found that the effect of power on moral hypocrisy depends on the legitimacy of the power: When power was illegitimate, the moral-hypocrisy effect was reversed, with the illegitimately powerful becoming stricter in judging their own behavior than in judging other people's behavior. This pattern, which might be dubbed hypercrisy, was also found among low-power participants in Experiments 3 and 4. We discuss how patterns of…

Perspective‐Taking as a Strategy for Improving Intergroup Relations: Evidence, Mechanisms, and Qualifications

Andrew R. Todd, Adam D. Galinsky

Sociology and Political Science · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · July 2014 · cited 364× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Abstract In this article, we review empirical research investigating the efficacy of perspective‐taking – the active consideration of others' mental states and subjective experiences – as a strategy for navigating intergroup environments. We begin by describing some of the benefits accrued from perspective‐taking: more favorable implicit and explicit intergroup evaluations, stronger approach‐oriented action tendencies and positive non‐verbal behaviors, increased intergroup helping, reduced reliance on stereotype‐maintaining mental processes, and heightened recognition of intergroup disparities. We then discuss several of the processes through which perspective‐taking operates, focusing specifically on two affective (i.e., parallel and reactive empathy) and two cognitive (i.e., shifts in attributional thinking and self‐outgroup merging) mechanisms. We also note several moderating factors…

The Effects of Perspective-Taking on Prejudice: The Moderating Role of Self-Evaluation

Adam D. Galinsky, Gillian Ku

Sociology and Political Science · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · May 2004 · cited 324× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Perspective-taking, by means of creating an overlap between self and other cognitive representations, has been found to effectively decrease stereotyping and ingroup favoritism. In the present investigation, the authors examined the potential moderating role of self-esteem on the effects of perspective-taking on prejudice. In two experiments, it was found that perspective-takers, but not control participants, with temporarily or chronically high self-esteem evaluated an outgroup more positively than perspective-takers with low self-esteem. This finding suggests an irony of perspective-taking: it builds off egocentric biases to improve outgroup evaluations. The discussion focuses on how debiasing intergroup thought is often best accomplished by working through the very processes that produced the bias in the first place.

Illegitimacy Moderates the Effects of Power on Approach

Joris Lammers, Adam D. Galinsky, Ernestine Gordijn +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Psychological Science · June 2008 · cited 316× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

A wealth of research has found that power leads to behavioral approach and action. Four experiments demonstrate that this link between power and approach is broken when the power relationship is illegitimate. When power was primed to be legitimate or when power positions were assigned legitimately, the powerful demonstrated more approach than the powerless. However, when power was experienced as illegitimate, the powerless displayed as much approach as, or even more approach than, the powerful. This moderating effect of legitimacy occurred regardless of whether power and legitimacy were manipulated through experiential primes, semantic primes, or role manipulations. It held true for behavioral approach (Experiment 1) and two effects associated with it: the propensity to negotiate (Experiment 2) and risk preferences (Experiments 3 and 4). These findings demonstrate that how power is…

Lacking Power Impairs Executive Functions

Pamela K. Smith, Nils B. Jostmann, Adam D. Galinsky +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Psychological Science · May 2008 · cited 306× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Four experiments explored whether lacking power impairs executive functioning, testing the hypothesis that the cognitive presses of powerlessness increase vulnerability to performance decrements during complex executive tasks. In the first three experiments, low power impaired performance on executive-function tasks: The powerless were less effective than the powerful at updating (Experiment 1), inhibiting (Experiment 2), and planning (Experiment 3). Existing research suggests that the powerless have difficulty distinguishing between what is goal relevant and what is goal irrelevant in the environment. A fourth experiment established that the executive-function impairment associated with low power is driven by goal neglect. The current research implies that the cognitive alterations arising from powerlessness may help foster stable social hierarchies and that empowering employees may…

The Good Life of the Powerful

Yona Kifer, Daniel Heller, W. Q. Elaine Perunovic +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Psychological Science · 15 Jan 2013 · cited 274× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

A common cliché and system-justifying stereotype is that power leads to misery and self-alienation. Drawing on the power and authenticity literatures, however, we predicted the opposite relationship. Because power increases the correspondence between internal states and behavior, we hypothesized that power enhances subjective well-being (SWB) by leading people to feel more authentic. Across four surveys representing markedly different primary social roles (general, work, romantic-relationship, and friendship surveys; Study 1), and in an experiment (Study 2a), we found consistent evidence that experiencing power leads to greater SWB. Moreover, authenticity mediated this effect. Further establishing the causal importance of authenticity, a final experiment (Study 2b), in which authenticity was manipulated, demonstrated that greater authenticity directly increased SWB. Although striving…

Power Increases Social Distance

Joris Lammers, Adam D. Galinsky, Ernestine Gordijn +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Social Psychological and Personality Science · 15 Aug 2011 · cited 252× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Five experiments investigated the effect of power on social distance. Although increased social distance has been suggested to be an underlying mechanism for a number of the effects of power, there is little empirical evidence directly supporting this claim. Our first three experiments found that power increases social distance toward others. In addition, these studies demonstrated that this effect is (a) mediated by self-sufficiency and (b) moderated by the perceived legitimacy of power—only when power is seen as legitimate, does it increase social distance. The final two studies build off research showing that social distance is linked to decreased altruism and find an interaction between power and legitimacy on willingness to help others. The authors propose that the concept of social distance offers a synthesizing lens that integrates seemingly disparate findings in the power…

Powerful Postures Versus Powerful Roles

Li Huang, Adam D. Galinsky, Deborah H. Gruenfeld +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Psychological Science · 13 Dec 2010 · cited 251× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Three experiments explored whether hierarchical role and body posture have independent or interactive effects on the main outcomes associated with power: action in behavior and abstraction in thought. Although past research has found that being in a powerful role and adopting an expansive body posture can each enhance a sense of power, two experiments showed that when individuals were placed in high- or low-power roles while adopting an expansive or constricted posture, only posture affected the implicit activation of power, the taking of action, and abstraction. However, even though role had a smaller effect on the downstream consequences of power, it had a stronger effect than posture on self-reported sense of power. A final experiment found that posture also had a larger effect on action than recalling an experience of high or low power. We discuss body postures as one of the most…

When Being a Model Minority Is Good . . . and Bad: Realistic Threat Explains Negativity Toward Asian Americans

William W. Maddux, Adam D. Galinsky, Amy J. C. Cuddy +1 more

Sociology and Political Science · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · 27 Dec 2007 · cited 248× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

The current research explores the hypothesis that realistic threat is one psychological mechanism that can explain how individuals can hold positive stereotypical beliefs toward Asian Americans yet also express negative attitudes and emotions toward them. Study 1 demonstrates that in a realistic threat context, attitudes and emotions toward an anonymous group described by only positive, "model minority" attributes are significantly more negative than when the group was described using other positive attributes. Study 2 demonstrates that realistic threat significantly mediates the relationship between (a) the endorsement of the both the positive and negative stereotypes of Asian Americans and (b) subsequent negative attitudes and emotions toward them. Studies 3 and 4 conceptually replicate this effect in experimental situations involving interactions with Asian Americans in realistic…

Gendered Races

Adam D. Galinsky, Erika V. Hall, Amy J. C. Cuddy

Gender Studies · Psychological Science · 8 Mar 2013 · cited 238× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Six studies explored the overlap between racial and gender stereotypes, and the consequences of this overlap for interracial dating, leadership selection, and athletic participation. Two initial studies captured the explicit and implicit gender content of racial stereotypes: Compared with the White stereotype, the Asian stereotype was more feminine, whereas the Black stereotype was more masculine. Study 3 found that heterosexual White men had a romantic preference for Asians over Blacks and that heterosexual White women had a romantic preference for Blacks over Asians; preferences for masculinity versus femininity mediated participants' attraction to Blacks relative to Asians. The pattern of romantic preferences observed in Study 3 was replicated in Study 4, an analysis of the data on interracial marriages from the 2000 U.S. Census. Study 5 showed that Blacks were more likely and Asians…

Perspective-takers behave more stereotypically.

Adam D. Galinsky, Cynthia S. Wang, Gillian Ku

Sociology and Political Science · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2008 · cited 238× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Nine studies demonstrated that perspective-takers are particularly likely to adopt a target's positive and negative stereotypical traits and behaviors. Perspective-takers rated both positive and negative stereotypic traits of targets as more self-descriptive. As a result, taking the perspective of a professor led to improved performance on an analytic task, whereas taking the perspective of a cheerleader led to decreased performance, in line with the respective stereotypes of professors and cheerleaders. Similarly, perspective-takers of an elderly target competed less compared to perspective-takers of an African American target. Including the stereotype in the self (but not liking of the target) mediated the effects of perspective-taking on behavior, suggesting that cognitive and not affective processes drove the behavioral effects. These effects occurred using a measure and multiple…

MOSAIC: A Model of Stereotyping Through Associated and Intersectional Categories

Erika V. Hall, Alison V. Hall, Adam D. Galinsky +1 more

Gender Studies · Academy of Management Review · 28 Dec 2018 · cited 237× · DOI ↗ · more like this ·

Despite increased awareness of a wide range of demographics, existing theory fails to adequately explain how the stereotypes associated with multiple demographic categories (e.g., Black, female, gay, Muslim) combine to influence evaluations of employees. We present MOSAIC—a model of stereotyping through associated and intersectional categories—to explain how stereotypes from various demographic categories influence the expectations for, and visibility of, employees. MOSAIC makes sense of outcomes previously seen as anomalies and theoretically reconciles patterns of advantage and disadvantage that individuals experience (e.g., why Black women face less backlash for assertiveness but are less likely to be promoted and earn considerably less than White women). Extending intersectionality research to management scholarship, we introduce the concept of an associated demographic category…