Abstract
Stephen Toulmin once observed that `it has never been customary for philosophers to pay much attention to the rhetoric of mathematical debate'. Might the application of Toulmin's layout of arguments to mathematics remedy this oversight? Toulmin's critics fault the layout as requiring so much abstraction as to permit incompatible reconstructions. Mathematical proofs may indeed be represented by fundamentally distinct layouts. However, cases of genuine conflict characteristically reflect an underlying disagreement about the nature of the proof in question.
References 2
2 of 18 references are in the index.
order
Cited by
No paper in the index cites this yet (Semantic Scholar counts 61 in total).
The cited-by list is still filling in while reference lists are collected.