Computer Science · Computer Networks and Communications
Using Reference Models for business Process Improvement: A Fuzzy Paradigm Approach.
Oliver Thomas, Otmar Adam, Peter Loos
See on the mapAbstract
In business practice the enterprise-specific adaptation of reference models for process improvement is characterized by the fact that decision-making premises do not exist in the form of mathematic models or numeric values. Decisions are characterized by consideration and creativity and are usually derived from fuzzy conditions. Although these conditions are not precise, additional and important information for the understanding of concrete business situations is connected with them. Thus, verbal information, as well as vaguely formulated statements, premises, objectives and restrictions are very important for reference model adaptation. The systematic consideration of fuzzy data in reference model adaptation can only succeed, when the models to be adapted themselves allow the consideration of fuzzy data. The fuzzy set theory-based extension of information modeling therefore provides the foundation for the development of a methodology, as well as the prototypical realization of a tool for reference model adaptation with regard to fuzzy data in this article. 1. Vagueness in Reference Model Adaptation Information models are defined as purpose-relevant representations of an information system designed by way of a construction process [vom Brocke 2003, p.16; Thomas 2005a, p.25]. They are simply referred to as models. A reference model—to be precise: reference information model—is an information model used for the construction of other models. This article is therefore based upon a use-oriented reference model term which focuses on the use of reference models for the construction of enterprise-specific models [vom Brocke 2003, p. 34; Thomas 2005b, p. 24]. The reference model terms often found in information systems literature, based upon attributes which characterize these reference models—in particular the attributes “universality” and 48 BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS – BIS 2006 “recommendation character” [vom Brocke 2003, p.31ff.]—will not be followed here. Every model resp.partial model which can be used to support the construction of another model can be seen in this sense as a reference model. The reutilization of reference models connected with this can be seen as a fundamental idea resulting from paperless, tool-supported data-processing consulting at the start of the 1990ies. The user‘s primary task in reference model-based construction, which can be supported by IT-tools, is the adaptation of reference models. The derivation of specific models from a reference model characterized by this term corresponds with the creation of variants of reference models [Schutte 1998, pp.207–209]. Thus, for example, the enterprise-specific models information model productoriented manufacturing enterprise 1 E or information model process-oriented manufacturing enterprise 2 E could be derived as variants of the reference model manufacturing. The adaptation of a reference model consists of two phases in accordance with the understanding of the term in this article [Schutte 1998, p.316]. In a first step, the reference model is approximated to the requirements of the enterprise being considered. In a second step, modifications are made to the model. While the first phase focuses on a semi-automatic adjustment process, the second phase represents a process which must be carried out manually by the model-user. The result of the adaptation process is an enterprise-specific to-bemodel, which can be put into practice, i.e. implemented in the company. Although a wide variety of guidelines, procedure models, modeling languages and tools for the development of to-be-models for business processes exist, reusable “know-how”, which considers process flow and data processing support in an integrated sense, is not sufficiently available. In many areas the need for the repeated use of work-pieces (for example: modular systems in industrial product design) exists, not least due to economic reasons, whereas process design usually represents industrial single-pa