Abstract
Abstract The share of gross domestic product (GDP) devoted to defence-spending is an unsatisfactory indicator for assessing an ally’s contribution to NATO. However, it remains a key benchmark for assessing burden-sharing in policy circles and in scholarship. That said, there is an equally significant burden-sharing story to be told that focuses on allied contributions to crisis management operations. NATO interventions in Bosnia and Kosovo in the mid-1990s and in Afghanistan from 2002 to 2014 were intended to stabilize fragile states and suppress belligerent local actors. With the exception of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan, the Europeans did not free-ride on the Americans as is commonly believed. On the contrary, at an operational level (or at the output level of analysis), the Europeans exceeded their expected aggregate contribution militarily. This chapter suggests that examining input and output variables is insufficient to judge the quantitative balance of contributions to NATO operations. These variables should be supplemented by two others—outcomes and long-term impacts. Both are currently understudied in the burden-sharing debate.