ANDREW DENSON. Demanding the Cherokee Nation: Indian Autonomy and American Culture 1830-1900. (Indians of the Southeast.) Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. 2004. Pp. 327. $55.00

Abstract

Andrew Denson investigates nineteenth-century Cherokee political thought as expressed in public memorials, petitions, and appeals. Though he is attentive to event-specific changes, Denson finds consistency in Cherokee assertions of progress and the nation's viability within an expanding, modern United States. Aimed primarily at Euro-American audiences, Cherokee writings strategically employed rhetoric that was deeply engaged with contemporary American culture, which had the effect of conflating Cherokee interests with those of the United States. Mindful of the limits of this strategy, Denson offers lessons in the promise and perils of arguing in terms set by Euro-Americans and provides a glimpse of “what might have been” had the Cherokees achieved their political goals. Beginning with the Removal crisis, the Cherokees “developed language and adopted arguments that would appear in varying forms in their communications to white America in the decades to come” (p. 15). In addition to upholding their treaty relationship with the United States, Cherokees adopted the republican rhetoric of virtue, steeped in nostalgic reverence for the Founding Fathers. This was especially the case for “the Great Washington,” whom they held up “as an example of selflessness in hopes of curbing American materialism” (p. 36). Moreover, the Cherokees lauded their recent civilizing advancements to counter the myth of the “disappearing Indian.” Denson recognizes, however, that by doing so the Cherokees “accepted the terms with which European Americans identified Indian people … [and] embraced as a structuring principle the notion that Native Americans faced a choice between emulating white civilization and disappearing.” Foreshadowing the arguments set forth later in the book, Denson states that the definition of the Cherokee nation “as a civilizing institution, a barrier to decline, and a test of American morality” would shape Cherokee rhetoric for the rest of the century (p. 51).