Economic Development in Northeast Thailand: Problems and Prospects

Abstract

Both the Thai and American governments have apparently concluded that poverty coupled with past neglect by the center have made the Northeast region of Thailand ripe for infiltration by anti-government forces. To forestall these anticipated political developments this region has been made the center of American and to a large extent Thai efforts for economic and social improvement. The social and political aspects of the problem will be discussed by other authors in this symposium; I shall review briefly the economic setting in the Northeast and the prospects for the region's development. Of the four major regions of Thailand the Northeast is the poorest.' The National Statistical Office recently published the first regional income estimates which show that in 1962 per capita income in the Northeast was only $45 compared with roughly $100 for the remainder of the country.2 Poverty in the Northeast is a rural phenomenon; the figure of $125 for per capita income in the towns is roughly comparable to that for the towns of the other regions (excluding Bangkok/Thonburi). But rural income in the Northeast is, I estimate, on average only 65%o as high as in the other three regions of the country. Moreover, income among farmers is not, as has sometimes been claimed, equally distributed; the upper 2% of villagers in the Northeast received 10 times as much cash income per capita as the lowest 78%, and also consumer in kind five times as much.3 This latter group of farmers in the lowest income group earn on average only $15 per