Abstract
Dedicated to Timothy J. Lyons THE HISTORY OF INCEST LITERATURE, like most history, has been dominated by patriarchy. Freud's uncovering of extent of incest and his subsequent recanting of his findings is well known. The shroud of secrecy, silence, and lies woven by patriarchy was ripped in late 1970s by feminists, many of whom were psychologists, who revealed their and others' pain as survivors of incest.1 Speak-outs were organized that provided incest survivors with a forum to tell their stories as a means of educating public about dimensions of sexual violence in home. They were meant to raise consciousness of a society that was in denial about this issue. In 1970s, even professionals in mental health field felt incest was rare (Armstrong 24). Over last twenty-five years, in literally hundreds of books, survivors, therapists, and scholars have testified to prevalence of incest and terrible cost this abuse wreaks on its victims (Edie 1997). Though there has been some change in terms of social action and legislation, there has also been a backlash against movement, resulting in medicalization of incest as a syndrome or disorder rather than a crime, and to its often being positioned in dominant discourse as a sensationalized and prurient topic. Given that the unconscious of patriarchal society has structured film form, (Mulvey 412), questions I aim to answer in this article are: How has dominant discourse subsumed and distorted survivor discourse in feature films? Has survivor discourse been co-opted and exploited, represented in ways that undermine and even mock its subversive impact? How do both dominant and feminist incest discourse and media responses structure cinematic representations of victims and perpetrators of parental incest?2 To quote Julia Lesage, If we look closely at narrative films, with intent of decolonizing our minds, we will find a similar 'story' about sexual relations running below surface of film after film. Over and over again, male and female film characters are assigned certain familiar, recognizable sexual traits, which provide a ready way of expressing culture's commonly held sexual fantasies (235). Two films, Lolita (1997) and Murmur of Heart (1972), provide patriarchal archetypes of male and female representation in terms of incest. In addition, three categories of incest films made since 1970s will be analyzed in relation to feminist literature on incest: backlash films in which protagonist is a female survivor, films that explore incest in relation to male survivors, and recent films in which survivors, both male and female, speak out.3 My thesis: medicalization of incest, together with pervasive misogyny and a deep aversion to topic as a socio-political issue, has resulted, in female backlash films, in a view of survivor as sex-obsessed, damaged, and dangerous. When survivor is male, he is represented as highly sexed, and if he is viewed as damaged, his pain and anger are internalized. Both of these representations draw on traditional patriarchal stereotypes. Finally, when incest survivors speak out, in such films as A Thousand Acres (1997) and The Celebration (1998), films resemble feminist speak-outs and function as a counter discourse by giving victims a voice. Thus, these two films breach most powerful taboo of all, cultural prohibition against representing incest for what it is: a horrific form of domestic violence. They stand in stark contrast to majority of incest films that deflect attention from crime and perpetrator, onto victim. Archetypes and Myths Female-The Construction of a Nymphet Freud discovered early in his career that female patients whom he labeled hysterics or neurotics had one startling thing in common-they had been or were being sexually abused, most often by their fathers. …