Participation in Post-Disaster Redevelopment

Abstract

This thesis researches how a community can start participatory developments in the recovery phase by working towards consensus with the local government in order to overcome being left out of the post-disaster redevelopment process. It consists of a research design, a theoretical framework, a methodological framework, a case study, and a model for initiating participatory development. The composition of the theoretical framework by doing an extensive literature review has resulted in a clear definition of participatory development and a practical spectrum of participation. The differences in government and resident perspective have been analyzed and evaluated, resulting in a list of nine variables. The panelists have assigned appropriate levels of participation to each of the variables, according to their perspective. The results from this part of the research indicate a moderate agreement among panelists. This means that for six variables, there is a shared perspective on the desired approach to participatory development opportunities. For three variables, the conclusion has to be drawn that there is no shared perspective at this point in time. The panelists have offered suggestions for project-based recovery opportunities. These suggestions have been evaluated using the spectrum of participation, and are explained regarding their implications for tangible projects. The methodological design used in this thesis is used to construct a model capable of enabling residents & local government to form a mutual understanding about planning & implementing post-disaster redevelopments in the recovery phase, identifying essential local recovery projects accordingly. The methods used in and designed for this case study have resulted in a model that enables a community to initiate participatory developments in the recovery phase, even when the residents have been excluded from the post-disaster redevelopment process so far.