arXiv.itsnick.co

an independent field guide to 23 million papers from arXiv & OpenAlex — not affiliated with arXiv.org

Computer Science · cs.CL

Leveraging Large Language Models for NLG Evaluation: Advances and Challenges

Zhen Li, Xiaohan Xu, Tao Shen, Can Xu, Jia-Chen Gu, Yuxuan Lai, Chongyang Tao, Shuai Ma

See on the map

Abstract

In the rapidly evolving domain of Natural Language Generation (NLG) evaluation, introducing Large Language Models (LLMs) has opened new avenues for assessing generated content quality, e.g., coherence, creativity, and context relevance. This paper aims to provide a thorough overview of leveraging LLMs for NLG evaluation, a burgeoning area that lacks a systematic analysis. We propose a coherent taxonomy for organizing existing LLM-based evaluation metrics, offering a structured framework to understand and compare these methods. Our detailed exploration includes critically assessing various LLM-based methodologies, as well as comparing their strengths and limitations in evaluating NLG outputs. By discussing unresolved challenges, including bias, robustness, domain-specificity, and unified evaluation, this paper seeks to offer insights to researchers and advocate for fairer and more advanced NLG evaluation techniques.

References

The reference list for this paper has not been collected yet.

Cited by 3

3 papers in the index cite this (Semantic Scholar counts 50 in total).

The cited-by list is still filling in while reference lists are collected.

More like this