Abstract
Used to estimate the risk of an estimator or to perform model selection, cross-validation is a widespread strategy because of its simplicity and its apparent universality. Many results exist on the model selection performances of cross-validation procedures. This survey intends to relate these results to the most recent advances of model selection theory, with a particular emphasis on distinguishing empirical statements from rigorous theoretical results. As a conclusion, guidelines are provided for choosing the best cross-validation procedure according to the particular features of the problem in hand.
References
The reference list for this paper has not been collected yet.
Cited by 17
17 papers in the index cite this (Semantic Scholar counts 4,058 in total).
The cited-by list is still filling in while reference lists are collected.